Negative because the graph goes down
The emerging velocity of the bullet is <u>71 m/s.</u>
The bullet of mass <em>m</em> moving with a velocity <em>u</em> has kinetic energy. When it pierces the block of wood, the block exerts a force of friction on the bullet. As the bullet passes through the block, work is done against the resistive forces exerted on the bullet by the block. This results in the reduction of the bullet's kinetic energy. The bullet has a speed <em>v</em> when it emerges from the block.
If the block exerts a resistive force <em>F</em> on the bullet and the thickness of the block is <em>x</em> then, the work done by the resistive force is given by,

This is equal to the change in the bullet's kinetic energy.

If the thickness of the block is reduced by one-half, the bullet emerges out with a velocity v<em>₁.</em>
Assuming the same resistive forces to act on the bullet,

Divide equation (2) by equation (1) and simplify for v<em>₁.</em>

Thus the speed of the bullet is 71 m/s
Answer:
The conditions necessary for hearing the echo. The distance between the sound source and the reflecting surface must not be less than 17 metres where the time period between hearing the original sound and its echo should not be less than 0.1 of a second.
Answer:
The answer to your question is T2 = 580.5 °K
Explanation:
Data
Temperature 1 = T1 = 273°K
Pressure 1 = P1 = 388 kPa
Pressure 2 = P2 = 825 kPa
Temperature 2 = ?
Process
1.- Use the Gay-Lussac law
P1/T1 = P2/T2
-Solve for T2
T2 = P2T1/P1
-Substitution
T2 = (825)(273) / 388
-Simplification
T2 = 225225 / 388
-Result
T2 = 580.5 °K
Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight, Charles Lindbergh
Explanation:
““Very reluctant” appropriately modifies the subject of the Equal clause Charles Lindbergh.
Nevertheless, Charles Lindberg addresses the sentence in the question. And claim that, "It was... the justification and be reluctant" renders Lindberg's hesitation rather than Lindberg himself immune to the judgment.
In comparison to sounding wordy, this structure deliberately undermines the essence of the expression by moving the emphasis to a tangential topic.