Here's the given:
P=$400
i=7.5%
A=$8500
The formula used for this problem is:
A = P(1+i)^t
Manipulating the equation to arrive at t, we have:
t = ln(A/P) / ln(1+i)
Plugging in values:
t = ln($8500/$400) / ln(1+0.075)
t = 42.26 years
3x+2=x+2x+4
-2 -2
3x=x+2x+4-2
3x=3x+4-2
-3x -3x
x= 4-2
x=2
X=7 because the side with the equation is the same length as the side that’s 38, so you just subtract 3 from 38 and then divide 35 by 5. You get 7. So, x=7
Hope this helps:)
Please rate branliest
Answer:
301.42 ft from base
Step-by-step explanation:
We can look at this situation as a triangle, the cliff is straight up and we're looking for the lowest side of the triangle. So to figure this out we use tangent, tangent is equal to Opposite over adjacent. So the tangent(37)= bear from base/height of cliff. We then multiply tan(37) by 400 to get the answer
Yes. If you have very high or very low outliers in your data set, it is generally preferred to use the median - the mid-point when all data points are arranged from least to greatest.
<span>A good example for when to avoid the mean and prefer the median is salary. The mean is less good here as there are a few very high salaries which skew the distribution to the right. This drags the mean higher to the point where it is disproportionately affected by the few higher salaries. In this case, the median would only be slightly affected by the few high salaries and is a better representation of the whole of the data. </span>
<span>In general, if the distribution is not normal, the mean is less appropriate than the median.</span>
