Answer:
Based on the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion, there is convincing statistical evidence that he is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
The proportion from the sample of people from his party that support the law = 70%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 550 people
The proportion from the sample of people from the other party that support the law = 65%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 420 people
The confidence level of the test = 95%
The given confidence interval for the difference in proportion, C.I. = (-0.010, 0.110)
Given that the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion ranges from -0.010, to 0.110, it is 95% certain that 0 is among the likely difference in proportion between the two populations and therefore, there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that there is no difference in the proportion of the members of either political that support the proposed new traffic law.
Answer:
This depends on the situation. For context, you use less than when your inequality CANNOT exceed more than.
You would use less than or equal to if your inequality can be equal to a number. Here's an example.
John needs to buy X oranges and Y apples. He can AT MOST buy 10 total fruits.
x + y (equal to or less than) 45
John needs to buy X oranges and Y apples. He CANNOT buy more than 10 total fruits.
x + y < 45
Answer:
Green and blue is your answer.
:)
A single drink would cost be $1.55. This is because:
13 + 4x - 6 = 13.20.
(13.20 - 13 + 6) = 6.20.
6.20 / 4 = 1.55
Hope this helped.
There is no math :(
so therefore i can not complete the math problem
