If you still haven’t received help type this question on google
When there are not enough productive resources, the production possibility frontier (PPF) slopes downward, but when resources are distributed according to their comparative advantages, it bends outward. According to the law of rising opportunity cost, this allocation will likely result in an adverse outcome.
This is further explained below.
<h3>Hy is most production possibilities frontiers (PFS) for goods bowed outward (concave downward)?</h3>
Generally, The Productivity and Potential Frontier is sloping downward because there are not enough productive resources, but it is bowing outward because resource allocation is driven by comparative advantage.
The term "resource" refers to all of the resources that are present in our surroundings, are possible from a financial, cultural, and technical standpoint, and are available to us so that we may fulfill our requirements and gratify our desires.
In conclusion, The scarcity of productive resources is what causes the PPF to slope downward. It follows that the rule of growing opportunity cost will be valid if such an allocation is performed.
Read more about scarcity
brainly.com/question/13186252
#SPJ1
Answer:
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Explanation:
The babysitter expects Dennis to behave badly because the parents told her so. She acts according to those expectations by assigning a nickname to Dennis. These actios lead to the fulfillment of her expectations. This is a classical example of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Answer: Apparently, the main explanation why people did not stop to help the victim was the degree of obsession they had in trouble.
Even student who were going to talk about the good Samaritan were less likely to stop to offer help if they were running from one place to another.
Apparently, people who were in a hurry did not even notice the presence of the victim, although, to be fair, once they reached their destination and had time to think about the consequences they felt some guilt and anxiety.
This indicates that ignoring the victim is not necessarily a consequence of an indifferent attitude, but of being so involved in the things of one that the presence of the victim is not really noticeable.
In this order of ideas, the person who would be more likely to help a victim would be one who values their religion and belief too much or need a purpose for their life.