I think the impact that "muckracking" had on Americans was this:
Due to the mishaps and the loss of trust that some Americans may have for their own, state, county, or even government that used some points of "muckracking" to begin. The best examples of "muckracking" in history can be accountable in today's day in age of the 21st Century. Now, for the most recent events on the other hands we could go on about lists and lists about things such as Donald Trump and Stormy Daniels and so on and so forth (But we won't talk about those begin again, this is only meant to answer your question, not bring up another :D but then again, we all differ from opinion) Now back to the point- I think that the best common examples of "muckracking' in today's society would be through celebrities and politicians. Many of the paparazzi try to capture celebrity photos, but also grab their opinions about things, but then twist and divert the story in a whole other way. But the same goes for politicians except using a different method. Anyways this is my opinion on how I see "muckracking" and how it has impacted Americans.
I hope my opinion and answer to your question was able to clear up some things. If you have any more questions about this or need another opinion on it- or if you simply just have another question that you would like to have answered, please check out my profile and I will be happy to do so. Again, I hope this was helpful to you, have a wonderful day! :)
I think it’s A or C it’s between one of those sorry
<u>Answer:
</u>
It is a crime and PC 470 and PC 473 are the Penal Code Sections that address this crime.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Any individual who chooses to do a signature in someone else's name on a document that can be deemed as legal in the court of law is committing a crime that is punishable as it is a civil offense.
- Greg's action of signing the document by himself in someone else's name simply because he had acquired an oral consent of the other person is considered by law as a crime under Penal Code 470 and Penal code 473.
<u>Explanation</u>:
<em><u>Debate</u></em>: The debate was regarding slavery in the Missouri. The compromise was that Missouri would have slaves, but no future states could have slaves. The situation made clear that some people work to end slavery but some slave-owning states were not ready to give up slavery.
<em><u>Missouri Compromise</u></em>: 11 states of Missouri are Free states and 11 other states are under slavery. People in Missouri wanted slavery. In 1820, Laws are passed to maintain balance of power between slave and free states.
Senator Henry Clay convinced Congress to accept the Missouri Compromise. So Maine was admitted into the Union as a free state, and Missouri as a slave state.
Answer:
The Dust Bowl was the name given to the drought-stricken Southern Plains region of the United States, which suffered severe dust storms during a dry period in the 1930s. As high winds and choking dust swept the region from Texas to Nebraska, people and livestock were killed and crops failed across the entire region
Explanation:
