Answer:
The minimum annual synergy that Three Guys feels it will gain from the acquisition is $ 178,500
Explanation:
Value of synergy gain from acquisition = 18 - 15.9 = 2.1 million
Annual synergy gain = 2.1 *.085 = .1785 million or $ 178,500
Annual synergy gain = $ 178,500
Answer:
b) Nothing, because you are already minimizing cost
Explanation:
cost of producing one additional unit by hiring more workers = $10 / 50 units = $0.20 per unit
cost of producing one additional unit by buying the machine = $200 / 1,000 units = $0.20 per unit
Since labor exhibits a diminishing return, the next unit of labor will produce less than 50 units. This means that if you want to increase production, you should buy the machine.
Using the same logic, the previous units of labor were able to produce more than 50 units, which means that the average total cost was lower using labor than the machine. So if the company's concern is to minimize costs, then they are already doing so.
The reason why commodity futures contracts are transferable is: <span>They can be bought and sold but the obligation in the contract remains valid.
Commodity futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell a specific asset at a specific price somewhere in the future.
This contract does not specify the name of the person who should buys the asset, so it could be transferable as long as the exchange is still fuiflled.
</span>
Answer: Into functional departments, with departmental managers who report to the CEO and small corporate staff
Explanation: In simple words, functional structure refers to the structure under which an organisation divides its work by making different departments for the core activities that are to be performed.
Under such structure, every department have employees working on a single activity they were assigned to like sales finance etc. Every department gets one manager who is liable to report to the CEO of the company.
Answer:
0.89 orders per minute
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
Batch size = 4 orders
Here, process 1 = cooking
process 2 = Bagging and payment accepting
Time taken to complete process 1 by cooking a batch of 4 orders
= 3 × 1 + 0.5 × 3
= 4.5 minutes
Time taken to complete process 2 by Bagging and payment accepting of 4 orders
= 0.80 × 4
= 3.2 minutes
Time in process 1 is greater than time taken in process 2
Since, process 1 is bottleneck operation So, it will decide the capacity of project. therefore,
Overall capacity = 4.5 minutes for 4 orders
Therefore number of orders = 4 ÷ 4.5
= 0.89 orders per minute
Hence, Process capacity = 0.89 orders per minute