Answer:
Participation is needed to obtain necessary commitment
Explanation:
Decision Making Process is a process of Evaluation of various alternatives available through several methods like forecasting.
During evaluation, risk, time and the efficiency of these alternatives are checked.
Team-centred decision making style is preferable when;
1. Relevant information and how to go about issues cannot be not properly arranged by one person
2. Participation is needed for commitment
3. Making one individual as the central power hurts the team
4. If an uncommon decision is to be made
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding in each cases is as follows:
a. At the time when the shares are issued at cash
= (303,000 × 12 ÷ 12) + (31,200 × 8 ÷ 12)
= 303,000 + 20,800
= 323,800 shares
b. At the time when the shares are issued in the stock dividend
= (303,000 × 12 ÷ 12) + (29,700 × 12 ÷ 12)
= 303,000 + 29,700
= 332,700 shares
Answer:
The correct answer is b. will go primarily to consumers.
Explanation:
Inelastic demand is that demand that is not very sensitive to a change in price. In this way, before a variation in the price the quantity demanded reacts in a less than proportional way. For example, if the price increases by 10% and in response the quantity demanded is reduced by less than 10%, then the demand is said to be inelastic.
While the elasticity of the offer presents the degree of response of the quantities offered to variations in the price of the good considered, the price of other goods, the costs of productive factors or business expectations.
For economies of scope to occur it must be true that THE COST OF PRODUCING THE TWO GOODS TOGETHER IS LESS THAN THE COST OF PRODUCING THE GOODS SEPARATELY.
The economy of scope is the proportionate savings that is gained by producing two or more different goods together, when the cost of doing so is less than that of producing each separately.
<span>Circumstances that help Walmart succeed usually makes it difficult for little businesses to thrive. The absence of government regulation generally profits big businesses and is unfavorable to small businesses. This leads to the emergence of monopolies and the abolishment of little businesses, even if they are original and innovative. In theory; more government regulation (if fair and just) would help small businesses compete more fairly with big business.</span>
