The correct answer is A hasty generalization of the anecdotal evidence variety.
Explanation: In this case we can understand that the awards often do not evaluate certain areas that should be evaluated, this makes these awards not so valuable because in fact the possibilities in general are not fully explored.
The best way to stay hydrated is take a drink whenever you pass a water fountain
Answer:
Sorry I dunno Pls forgive me I just want points I m sorry
True. He didn't disprove them but rather improve and broaden Kepler's original laws.
I believe the answer is:C. People with few friends should be more likely to commit crimes
Number of friends usually consistent with lesser chance of depression and higher chance of obtaining help during troubles. Even though this may not applicable all the time, We can assume that people with lesser friends are more likely to experience the opposite, which increase the potential to be criminals.
