In a research study designed to test the effects of alcohol on sociability, neither the participants nor the investigator are aware of who receives alcohol and who does not. this is an example of: the double blind technique.
<h3>What is the double blind technique?</h3>
This is the term that is used in experiments to refer to the existing situation where the people carrying out the experiments and the ones that are participants do not know the particular person that is receiving a given treatment,
Hence we have to say that based on the fact that the participants and and the investigator do not know the groups that are taking the the alcohol and who does not, it is a double blind study.
Read more on double blind technique here: brainly.com/question/23389356
#SPJ1
Answer:
No impact.
Explanation:
In some countries, states do not have the autonomy to formulate their own laws. The US is not one of those. In the state territory, although there are laws that apply throughout the country, each state can formulate its own laws and these must be followed within the limits of the state and punishable by those who disobey. The law of each state must be judged in its home state and cannot be imposed on another state that does not accept that law as the rule to be followed. Thus, in relation to the above question, we can conclude that if state law in the neighboring state requires that interrogation be recorded on video, that law has no impact on state interrogation that does not require such recording.
Answer:
The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors.
