Can anyone help me with my homework?

What is the closest to the area of this figure? d = 17 in

OverLord2011 [107]

the answer would be b the answer is 114

6 0

3 years ago

I really need help finding the solution!!

Mrac [35]

Answer:

-0.5 is not a solution

2 is a solution

Step-by-step explanation:

To check if something is a solution of the equation, you need to substitute the value in place of the variable

15 + 2y = -12 - 4y

15 + 2(-0.5) = -12 - 4(-0.5)

15 - 1 = -12 + 2

14 ≠ -10 ∴ -0.5 is not a solution

5 - 2(3x + 5) = 3 - 10x

5 - 2[3(2) + 5] = 3 - 10(2)

5 - 2(6 + 5) = 3 - 10(2)

5 - 12 - 10 = 3 - 120

-17 = -17 ∴ 2 is a solution

3 0

3 years ago

2. The National Safety Council routinely analyzes the benefit of seat belt use on driver safety. Their data showed that among 28

JulijaS [17]

Answer:

We conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that among 2823 drivers not wearing seat belts, 31 died as a result of injuries, and among 7765 drivers wearing seat belts 16 were killed.

Let $p_1$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts.

$p_2$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1=p_2$ {means that there is no difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1\neq p_2$ {means that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts = $\frac{31}{2823}$ = 0.011

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts = $\frac{16}{7765}$ = 0.002

$n_1$ = sample of drivers not wearing seat belts = 2823

$n_2$ = sample of drivers wearing seat belts = 7765

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.011-0.002)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} } }$

= 4.438

The value of z test statistics is 4.438.

Now, at 5% significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistic doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Also, Margin of error (E) = $1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} }$

= $1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} }$

= 0.00397

5 0

3 years ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 20 PTS

Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

-6/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope is negative, around -1

7 0

3 years ago

you can type 250 characters in 60 seconds your friend can type 375 characters in 90 seconds do these ratios form a proportion

kykrilka [37]

Answer:

see the explanation below

Step-by-step explanation:

you can type 250 characters in 60 seconds your friend can type 375 characters in 90 seconds do these ratios form a proportion

Given data

you can type 250 characters in 60 seconds

your typing speed = 250/60

= 4.16 characters per seconds

your friend can type 375 characters in 90 seconds

your friends typing speed is

= 375/90

= 4.16 characters per seconds

Since both typing speeds corresponds, hence the ratios are proportional

5 0

3 years ago