Answer:
move up the career ladder
Explanation:
A career is a series of jobs that are related, whose foundation is based on interest, knowledge, training and experience. Moving up the career ladder means that one has continuously been growing in experience by moving from series of related jobs with fewer responsibilities to the one with more responsibilities within a specific profession.
Moving up the the career ladder also involve continuous advancement in education related to one's profession with a view to gaining more knowledge that would be applied to the chosen job hence above is an example of moving up the career ladder.
Answer:
Yield to maturity is 6.6%
Explanation:
Yield to maturity is the annual rate of return that an investor receives if a bond bond is held until the maturity.
Face value = F = $1,000
Assuming Coupon payments are made annually
Coupon payment = $1,000 x 8% = $80
Selling price = P = $1,100
Number of payment = n = 13 years
Yield to maturity = [ C + ( F - P ) / n ] / [ (F + P ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = [ $80 + ( 1000 - 1100 ) / 13 ] / [ (1,000 + 1100 ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = [ $80 - 7.7 ] / 1100 = $72.3 /1100 = 0.066 = 6.6%
<span>Economic growth is an increase amount of services or/ and goods produced by head of population over a period of time</span>
Answer:
The annual depreciation under SL is $16000 per year.
Explanation:
The depreciation expense under Straight Line (SL) method remains constant throughout an asset's useful life. The depreciation under straight line method is calculated by calculating the value of the asset that is eligible for depreciation, which is its cost less the salvage value (SV) and dividing it by the asset's useful life.
The straight line depreciation per year = (Cost - SV) / estimated useful life
Annual depreciation under SL = (100000 - 20000) / 5 = $16000 per year
Answer:
Devil’s advocacy
Explanation:
Devil’s advocacy is a thorough analysis of a preferred alternative to check and test its strengths and weaknesses before being implemented with the purpose of identifying all the faults that might make the preferred alternative unacceptable.
This method helps in determining the dangers of any action taken by an individual or group of persons.
