Answer:
Bill is also equally and somewhere more liable as he is the employer.
Explanation:
Although in records it might seem that George did the falsify act, but for that he required the permission of his employer.
When the fact is clearly stated that George did this on direction of his employer Bill, and that Bill demanded this intentionally in order to present extra profits, he is more liable for this false act.
As George is the employee, he is bound to follow the directions of his employer. Thus Bill is crucially liable for this act, as he is an important reason for this act.
Answer: B - ROI percentages
Explanation:
edge 2020
Answer:
3 years
Explanation:
Since the income tax is ignored, so the operating cash flows would be
= EBIT + Depreciation - Income tax expense
= $105,000 + $45,000 - $0
= $150,000
The operating cash flows are same for ten years
And, the initial investment is $450,000
So, the payback period would be
= Initial investment ÷ Net cash flows
= $450,000 ÷ $150,000
= 3 years
Answer:
Total assets is increased by $18,100
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
= Cash received from the issue of stock + revenue earned on account - cash paid for operating expenses
= $15,000 + $8,500 - $5,400
= $18,400
This positive amount shows that there is an increase in the total assets for $18,100
The cash collected from the account receivable is not relevant. Hence ignored it
