Answer:
B. $42,000
Explanation:
Trade receivables refers total amounts that customers of a company are owing the company for goods or services sold to them.
For Michael Co., this can be calculated as follows:
Michael's total trade receivables = 3-month note due from Michael's main customer + Due and unpaid from this month's sales + Due and unpaid from last month's sales
Therefore, we have:
Michael's total trade receivables = $12,000 + $19,000 + 11,000 = $42,000.
Therefore, Michael's total trade receivables is $42,000.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
c. Low-income developing countries are catching up to high-income industrial countries.
Explanation:
The evidence which shows that low income developing countries are catching up to high-income industrial countries could be found in the series of developmental strides made by some countries like Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, Indonesia, Vietnam etc over the years. <em>Most of their achievements is at par with most European countries in different sectors such as educational, and social sectors.</em>
Answer:
If the marginal propensity to save is 0.12, the marginal propensity to consume(mpc) is 0.88, and the multiplier is 8.33.
Explanation:
From the question, we are given the following:
mps = Marginal propensity to save = 0.12
The marginal propensity to consume (mpc) and the multiplier can therefore be calculated as follows:
mpc = 1 - mps ........................ (1)
Substituting the values for mps into equation (1), we have:
mpc = 1 - 0.12
mpc = 0.88
Also, we have:
Multiplier = 1 / mps ..................... (2)
Substituting the values for mps into equation (2), we have:
Multiplier = 1 / 0.12
Multiplier = 8.33
Therefore, if the marginal propensity to save is 0.12, the marginal propensity to consume(mpc) is 0.88, and the multiplier is 8.33.
Answer:
a small number of firms selling a homogeneous or a differentiated product
Explanation:
if this is one of the choices this is correct
When the organization faces an emergency situation.
Autocratic leadership (or authoritarian leadership) is characterized by a single person taking control of decision making. In an emergency, having a clear leader is sometimes the best option.