All categories

3 years ago

In which stage would you typically expect to see large negative Financing Cash Flows?

Business

1 answer:

kvasek [131]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

a. Startup

Explanation:

The negative cash flows are when the firms are having more cash outflow than the cash inflow and spending of the company is more than the earning and thus experiencing a negative cash flow.

This is a situation is found in the growth phase as they demand more money to generated and spend money to fuel growth and acquire the new customers and that may be set up by the distribution channels.

Thus startup of the company or industry can show more negative cash flows.

You might be interested in

According to 54 leadership experts of 38 countries, there are two key components to leadership. The first is the ability to pers

aev [14]

Answer: Enablers

Explanation:

Years ago, 54 leadership experts from 38 countries reached a consensus on leadership.

They agreed that leadership should be about influencing, motivating, and enabling others to contribute towards the goals of the Organization that they work for.

This consensus had 2 parts.

Firstly, leaders motivate others through persuasion and otherinfluence tactics.

Secondly and relatively more important in this question, leaders act as ENABLERS.

They ENABLE those under them by distributing resources, minimizing disruptions and just generally by being leaders to their subordinates to make it easier for the goals and objectives of the company to be realized.

3 0

3 years ago

The price of ice cream increases. In 1 or 2 sentences, explain how and why this affects the quantity of ice cream cones demanded

Ivan

As the price of ice cream increases, so the demand by consumers may decrease, decreasing the quantity of ice cream cones demanded (provided that all consumers eat ice cream with a cone!)

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Gitano Products operates a job-order costing system and applies overhead cost tojobs on the basis of direct materialsused in pro

IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:

$3,400

Explanation:

The computation of predetermined overhead rate for the year is shown below:-

Predetermined Overhead Rate = Estimated Manufacturing Overhead ÷ Estimated Allocation Base × 100

= $119,600 ÷ $92,000 × 100

= 130%

2. The computation of the amount of underapplied or overapplied overhead for the year is shown below:-

Overhead Applied = (Opening Value of Direct Material + Purchase of Direct Material - Closing Value of Direct Material) × Predetermined Overhead Rate

= ($24,000 + $140,000 - $17,000) × 130%

= $147,000 × 130%

= $191,100

Overhead Incurred = $106,300 + $8,000 + $18,000 + $15,000 + $8,200 + $39,000

= $194,500

Underapplied overhead = $194,500 - $191,100

= $3,400

6 0

3 years ago

Bill currently uses his entire budget to purchase 5 cans of Pepsi and 3 hamburgers per week. The price of Pepsi is $1 per can,

FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

Option (B) is correct.

Explanation:

The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:

$\frac{MU_x}{P_x}=\frac{MU_y}{P_y}$

It is given that,

price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can

price of a hamburger(y) = $2

Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4

Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6

Hence,

$\frac{4}{1}>\frac{6}{2}$

4 > 3

Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.

Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.

So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.

6 0

3 years ago

Evaluating od interventions always involves measuring their impact on employee satisfaction, productivity, and the bottom line.

Usimov [2.4K]

False. Evaluating interventions always involves measuring their impact on employee satisfaction, productivity, and the bottom line.

<h3>What is evaluating interventions?</h3>

A number of creative methods for conflict-resolution evaluation have been developed, despite the fact that conflict-resolution interventions are often evaluated on an as-needed basis.

1. Participants' Evaluation

Participatory evaluation is an evaluation strategy that is "bottom-up" or "people-centered."

2. Utilization-Focused Evaluation

In a utilization-focused evaluation, a group of "intended users" is identified who choose the "intended uses" for the evaluation data.

3. Impact Evaluation

The goal of an impact evaluation is to ascertain how effective an intervention is. Theoretically, this is straightforward, but the community involved in conflict resolution has not yet sufficiently defined the word "effect."

4. Action Evaluation

By encouraging stakeholders to define and track success, Action Evaluation seeks to assure the effectiveness of initiatives.

5. Macro-Evaluation

Macro-Evaluation, generally speaking, is to ascertain how grassroots micro-level initiatives 'ripple up' to the regional or national level.

To learn more about Evaluation of interventions visit:

brainly.com/question/28065744

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago