<span>I think western movies could be more realistic by giving more details to the conflicts
Often time, movies always had the good guys and the bad guys.
To be more honest, every conflicts that happened throughout the histoy is simply happened because there were 2 sides that confront each other for different interests
as for who is 'bad' and who is 'good', it depended entirely to the side that the story teller is on</span>
Answer:
7.77
Explanation:
d= m/v
18.5 / 2.35 = 7.87234x2.35= 18.5. so the answer is 7.77
Answer: "The police were very cruel. Black Americans cannot get fair trials in court"
Explanation:
Answer:
Overbreadth Doctrine
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the resolution was unconstitutional under the First Amendment Overbreadth Doctrine. This doctrine protects against prohibiting behavior that is guaranteed by the constitution, such as freedom of speech. The airport making a "First Amendment-Free Zone" was unconstitutional under this doctrine.
I believe the statement is true. Former Olympian Bruce Jenner won an endorsement deal for wheaties in his post-athletic career. <span>Jenner knew he would get </span>endorsement deals after winning<span> gold in the olympics. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
