It is fair to think about halting resuscitation in a newborn baby with no detectable heart beat if the heart rate is still absent after 10 minutes.
While people experience a cardiac arrest, they are talking to their family, going through the mall, or watching a game when they look to be completely normal. The best scenario in this condition would be to start a resuscitation procedure right once and ask for medical assistance, however this is a challenging situation and time is crucial to the patient's survival.
- Many experts predict that within 5 minutes, 50% of people who have experienced a cardiac arrest will be dead, and that the death rate will then increase by 10% per minute after that. So in the end, everyone will pass away in ten minutes. As a result, we can say that once all resuscitation attempts have been exhausted and there is no detectable pulse rate, 10 minutes would be a reasonable time to consider resuscitation interruption.
- These Neonatal Life Support Guidelines were created by Resuscitation Council UK (RCUK) based on the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Newborn Resuscitation and Support of Transition of Infants at Birth and the 2020 Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendations for Neonatal Life Support . The care of the term and preterm infant is covered by the guidelines.
To learn more about Resuscitation visit:brainly.com/question/3725035
#SPJ4
The correct answer is: it is possible that an interest in politics caused Jessica to join the <span>political science club.
The argument in the question is flawed because it automatically assumes that Jessica's </span>involvement in her school's political science club led her to take an interest in politics, rather than the other way round, when in fact it is possible that an interest in politics is what actually caused Jessica to join the political science club. The argument in the question is flawed because it made a causal claim simply by an unfounded assumption.
I'm going to say the oddysey? I'm probably wrong and I know that but maybe that will give you a hint?
Answer:
(d) Brazil
Explanation:
On October 26, 1917, Brazil declares its decision to enter the First World War on the side of the Allied powers. One day before the U.S. declaration of war, a German U-boat sank the Brazilian merchant ship Parana as it sailed off the coast of France.
