1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Grace [21]
3 years ago
13

A powder diet is tested on 49 people, and a liquid diet is tested on 36 different people. Of interest is whether the liquid diet

yields a higher mean weight loss than the powder diet. The powder diet group had a mean weight loss of 42 pounds with a standard deviation of 12 pounds. The liquid diet group had a mean weight loss of 45 pounds with a standard deviation of 14 pounds.
Mathematics
2 answers:
brilliants [131]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the liquid diet yields a higher mean weight loss than the powder diet (P-value = 0.15).

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between populations means.

The claim is that the liquid diet yields a higher mean weight loss than the powder diet.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H_0: \mu_1-\mu_2=0\\\\H_a:\mu_1-\mu_2< 0

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1 (powder diet group), of size n1=49 has a mean of 42 and a standard deviation of 12.

The sample 2 (liquid diet group), of size n2=36 has a mean of 45 and a standard deviation of 14.

The difference between sample means is Md=-3.

M_d=M_1-M_2=42-45=-3

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

s_{M_d}=\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{12^2}{49}+\dfrac{14^2}{36}}\\\\\\s_{M_d}=\sqrt{2.939+5.444}=\sqrt{8.383}=2.895

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

t=\dfrac{M_d-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_{M_d}}=\dfrac{-3-0}{2.895}=\dfrac{-3}{2.895}=-1.04

The degrees of freedom for this test are:

df=n_1+n_2-1=49+36-2=83

This test is a left-tailed test, with 83 degrees of freedom and t=-1.04, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

\text{P-value}=P(t

As the P-value (0.15) is greater than the significance level (0.05), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the liquid diet yields a higher mean weight loss than the powder diet.

Paladinen [302]3 years ago
5 0

The partner's answer is fine, that's why I have deleted mine

You might be interested in
What is the value of the expression below when z=10 3z-3
love history [14]

Answer:27

3(10)-3

30-3

27

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Multiply the polynomials. (4x^2 + 3z + 7)(8x - 5)
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

32x3−20x2+24xz+56x−15z−35

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Maria’s family hosts a barbeque every month in the summer. In May, they bought 3.2 pounds of hamburger and 3 packages of hot dog
Sindrei [870]
Given:

May:
hamburger: 3.2 pounds * 4.25 = 13.60
hotdogs:     3 packages * 4      = 12
Total cost: 13.60 + 12 = 25.60

June:
hamburger: 3.2 pounds * 1 1/2 = 4.8 pounds * 4.25 = 20.4
hotdogs:      3 packages * 1/3    = 1 package * 4        =   4
Total cost: 20.4 + 4 = 24.4

25.60 - 24.40 = 1.20

They spent more on May by $1.20. Choice C.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
S+2t=6. 3s-2t=2<br> Using elimination
Ludmilka [50]
For the first one, I will solve for t.
s + 2t = 6, first we isolate the t variable,
2t = -s + 6, divide both sides by 2,
t = -s/2 + 3, < There's your answer for 1!

Here's the second one,
3s - 2t = 2, subtract 3s from both sides,
-2t = 2 - 3s, divide both sides by -2,
t = -1 + 3s/2 < There's your second answer!
6 0
3 years ago
An animal reserve has 40,000 elk. The population increases 11% a year. How long tell the population is equal to 80,000. If someo
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

7 years (This answer is to the nearest year)

Step-by-step explanation:

The way you could work this out is by trial and error. 11 % a year means that its population increases by 4400 annually. 40,000 X 1.11^1 gives you the amount it would be after one year (44000). I got the 1.11 because of the percentage (0.11) plus the amount you need to do percentage increase (1). Then all you do is keep on going up till you hit the number you need (80,000) after about 7 years the total would have hit 80,000 and would have actually went past it (83046)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Having a hard time understanding this question (see attachment).
    5·2 answers
  • What is (-m)^-3n, if m= 2 and n= -24?<br><br> A. 3<br> B. -3<br> C. 4. <br> D. -4
    11·1 answer
  • On her first quiz in social studies, Meg answered 92% of the questions correctly. On her second quiz, she answered 27 out of 30
    7·2 answers
  • Simplify this expression 8n/17n
    12·2 answers
  • 1. 3(4 - 2x) = -2x<br><br> A. -1<br> B. 1<br> C. 2<br> D.3
    10·2 answers
  • Can someone help me identify the pairs of parallel lines
    5·1 answer
  • 3. Which of the following values is not possible in probability?
    7·2 answers
  • Myra will attend college in 18 months.
    8·2 answers
  • John can run 7 miles in 45 minutes. What is John's rate of speed in miles per hour?
    14·1 answer
  • Read the poem excerpt. A backyard reality is rearranged. Hopscotch lines cower and hide, The toys in the yard . . . lost until s
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!