Answer:
Look at their competitors positions of their products and take that into account.
Hope this helps
Explanation:
Answer:
The appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense is $3,345.20.
Explanation:
The appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense can be calculated as follows:
Bad debt expense = (Percentage of accounts receivable not yet due it will not collect * Accounts receivable not yet due) + (Percentage of receivables up to 30 days past due it will not collect * Amount of receivables up to 30 days past due) + (Parentage of receivables of receivables greater than 30 days past due it will not collect * Amount of receivables greater than 30 days past due) - Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (credit) ……………………… (1)
Substituting the relevant values into equation (1), we have:
Bad debt expense = (7% * $7,500) + (20% + $2,300) + (46% * $2,000) - $400 = $3,345.20
Therefore, the appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense is $3,345.20.
Answer:
The main reason behind using the residual income in place of rate if income is that the manager always goes for that project that gives maximum benefit to the organization.
Explanation:
The main reason behind using the residual income in place of rate if income is that the manager always goes for that project that gives maximum benefit to the organization.
As residual income is referred to income that calculated after deducting all debt and expenses occur on the project. ROI is a way to predict the profit of the project while residual income calculates the net income that the organisation generates from the project.
Reserves - $20,000
Checkable Deposits - $200,000
Reserves Ratio - 10
Household Deposit - $15,000
Level of Excess Reserves - ?
Solution:
Checkable Deposits = $200,000 + $15,000 = $215,000
Required Reserves = 0.10 x $215,000 = $21,500
Excess Reserves = Actual Reserves - Required Reserves
= $35,000 - $21,500 = $13,500
Answer:
$2,014
Explanation:
Alain's net investment income tax is the lesser of 1) his net investment income ($53,000) or 2) his modified adjusted gross income less the threshold of $200,000 .
Therefore
$304,000 - $200,000 = $104,000
3.8%×$104,000= $3,952
($53,000 × 3.8% )= $2,014
The additional tax that alain will pay on his net investment income for the year is $2,014
