Answer:
here the line A and H are parallel
We know that
in the first triangle
the ratio of the legs are
4.5/1.5-----> 3
then
case <span>A) 6 m and 2 m ------> ratio=6/3----> 3
so
</span><span>the legs of a second triangle are proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
</span>case B) 8 m and 5 m ------> ratio=8/5---->1.6
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
case C) 7 m and 3.5 mm ------> ratio=7/3.5---->2
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
case D) 10 m and 2.5 m ------> ratio=10/2.5---->4
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
case E) 11.25 m and 3.75 m ------> ratio=11.25/3.75---->3
so
the legs of a second triangle are proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
the answer is
A) 6 m and 2 m
E) 11.25 m and 3.75 m
Answer:
there can only be one possibility for a triangle when given the lengths of all the sides but for a quadrilateral the measure of the angles could differ depending on the person building the,. this is because triangles are more stable than quadrilaterals meaning that their side lengths follow a lot more rules than quadrilaterals do, for example the length of the side lengths can indicate whether or not that triangle is an acute, obtuse, or right triangle, and this is also evident by considering that you can use the SSS theorem to indicate two triangles are congruent, but for quadrilaterals you cant do that
Step-by-step explanation:
Group the common terms together
3x + 5x - 5 + 1
then add or subtract them
8x - 4
