The parts of the Ottoman Empire that fell under European
rule between the year 1880s and 1914 was the Middle eastern countries which are
composed of the following; Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt and as well as the
Libya as they are all parts of the middle eastern countries.
Hello friend...
The Zhou dynasty was pretty much non existent after the sacking of the capital by Quanrong in 771 BC since after that Zhou dynasty could no longer exert its power on its vassal states anymore. The vassal states now instead of listening to Zhou king they would listen to a Duke from a major state like Duke Huan of Qi (reign, 685 -643 BC), Duke Wen of Jin (reign, 636–628 BC), King Zhuang of Chu (reign, 613–591 BC), Duke Mu of Qin (reign, 659–621 BC). Some states outright countered the power of Zhou like Duke Zhuang of Zheng (743–701 BC) who even attacked Zhou. In Spring and Autumn period (770–475 BC) those Dukes still borrowed the name of Zhou king for their own advantage, so sometimes they paid tribute to Zhou king to borrow his approval. That was just to be nice, if Zhou king disapproved then the one who lost more was Zhou king himself since he would no longer receive any things from that major state and all other states allied to that major state. From Warring States period (475–221 BC), no one cared about what Zhou king had to say anymore and no one bothered to get his approval anymore. They just freely fought each other, conquered each other and deemed Zhou king as just lord of a minor state that they can take over anytime they wanted. Eventually, the little land of Zhou was conquered by Qin in 2 occasions: 256 BC and 249 BC.
Hence, officially, Zhou ended in 249 BC by the invasions from Qin. However, its power as a proper dynasty would have ended long before in the year of 771 BC.
And why the Zhou was attacked and lost its power in 771 BC ? That was largely due to the poor governing and poor credibility of King You of Zhou (reign 782–771 BC). He was a bad King, just like King Zhou of Shang, only into wines and girls without giving any thought on governing. In order to buy a laughter from the girl he loved, he ignited the big flames in the mountains which were used very exclusively for the cases of a serious emergency. Soldiers from vassal states were supposed to march toward the Zhou capital whenever they saw those flames, believing that the Zhou king was in danger. Thus, when they saw the king and his lover ridiculed them coming for nothing, they thought they were humilated by the king, and the king who played on the fate of his country didn’t deserve his post. Since then, the confidence that vassal states had on the king was all gone. And when Qianrung attacked the Zhou capital, no one came rescue when the flames were lit again. The king was killed in the attack, and Zhou lost its power since then. So I think the fall of Zhou was mainly due to King You of Zhou himself (due to his incompetence and moral depravity) since before him his father King Xuan of Zhou (827- 782) was a capable ruler, who brought back the stability and prosperity of Zhou.
And the further reason might be due to its problematic way of governing when at the foundation, Zhou rulers gave so much autonomy for their vassal states. Thus, when the central government became weakened and at the same time vassal states got stronger, inevitably Zhou central government can no longer hold its vassal states together. Later dynasty, Qin, Han got the lessons from Zhou and chose to build a centralized government with emperor having absolute power over any governing branches and any jurisdiction.
Hope this helps you...
Answer: The answer is C. Austrailia
Explanation:
The main reason we didn't join the League of nations is because we had the policy of isolationism
isolationism = America wants to focus on ourselves, we want to stay out of trouble
Answer:
The policy of the 'Indian Removal Act' had controversy in its application after agreement. This is because the issue is deemed an issue for the U.S. indigenous people. Many Indian tribes do not support this policy and try to counter and Cherokee one of them.
Explanation:
• Indian Removal Act
The' Indian Removal Act ' policy is one of U.S. President Andrew Jackson's racial policies. On May 28, 1830, this policy was signed. Five of the most important tribes are threatened as an outcome of this policy. Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole are among these. This policy called for debate and was regarded in the United States to demean the Indians. Including Cherokee Indians who believe this policy to be unfair. Recalling that the Cherokee Indians played a quite wide part in the war against the British occupation in 1812.
• Cherokee in the United States
Cherokee is not an Indian tribe that could be underestimated. Cherokee gave the role of their land to the United States Government during the United States Revolution. With this land grant, the government promised Cherokee protection. The Cherokee Indians, however, were pushed out by the' Indian Removal Act' policy.
The policy harmed the Cherokee Indians by the U.S government to be moved to the Oklahoma area. The Cherokee Indians, however, remained resistant and opposed the policy. They attempted to reject the policy on the pretext of protecting their homeland from the oppressed white community. The Cherokee Indians endured a tragic destiny despite the battle and this tragedy became known as ' The Trail of Tears ' that claimed the lives of as many as 4,000 Cherokee people.
Learn More
If you’re interested learning more about this topic, we recomended you also take a look at the following question:
• How did the New England, Mid-Atlantic, Chesapeake, and Southern colonies develop differently? brainly.com/question/13165633
• Which of these was not a key difference between Northern and Southern states at the Constitutional Convention? brainly.com/question/13165577
Keyword: Indian Removal Act, Cherokee, US Government, American History
Subject: History
Class: 10-12
Sub-chapter: American History
