Answer:
<h2>
294 cm²</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
Yes, so the Y intercept of the linear regression line is 250 ( it is on the y-axis at point [0,250]. You can also see that for every 2x the number on the y axis decreases by 50. This means that the slope is -25. Now put what we know into the equation for a line - y=mx+b
y = -25x +250
Answer:
Hence the stone meet at a height of 20 m above the ground after 4 seconds.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hey mate hope its help you.......
(3/2)x(2/3)=1
(7/4)x(3/2)=(21/6)=(7/2)
Stacey: 1 1/2 hours
Josh: 1 hour
Vicki: 3 1/2 hours