Which of these refers to the code of moral principles and values that govern behaviors with respect to what is right and wrong?

the supreme court denied the hazelwood high school student newspaper the right to print certain stories based on what logic?

lyudmila [28]

The Supreme Court denied the Hazelwood High School student newspaper the right to print certain stories based on what logic: E. The exercise of free expression by students cannot impede the educational mission of the school.

<h3>What is the Supreme Court?</h3>

Supreme Court is sometimes referred to as the ap-ex court and it can be defined as a federal court that ultimately represent the highest court based on the hierarchy of courts within the judicial branch.

<h3>What is the Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier?</h3>

Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier can be defined as a landmark litigation (court case) in 1988 between the Hazelwood School District in the United States of America and Kuhlmeier et al., which held that any student newspaper that hasn't been established as forums for student expression shall be subjected to a lower level of First Amendment protection.

In a 5-3 ruling, the Supreme Court of the United States of America ruled that Hazelwood High School student newspaper cannot print certain stories because free expression by students should not impede any school's educational mission.

Read more on Supreme Court here: brainly.com/question/8840520

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

The Supreme Court denied the Hazelwood High School student newspaper the right to print certain stories based on what logic?

Young people do not have First Amendment protection against libel.

The exercise of free expression by students is in violation of state educational codes.

Schools that allow free expression by students can legally be denied federal funding.

Incitement is never protected speech, even if it originates in a school newspaper.

The exercise of free expression by students cannot impede the educational mission of the school.

8 0

1 year ago

If you are an obsessive christian, every non-christian is a part of your _____.

Romashka [77]

i wanna say its C. Social loafing

5 0

3 years ago

Sharon typically watched televised news stations that support her existing political beliefs. She is less inclined to watch the

alexdok [17]

Answer:

Confirmation bias

Explanation:

According to the given statements in the question it can be concluded that the Sharon's approach illustrates " the confirmation bias ".

The confirmation bias means that a person seeks for the information or evidences that take forward their personal beliefs or gives a confirmation to the thoughts or beliefs that are already in their mind.

Here,

Sharon looks for the news that supports her existing political belief.

8 0

3 years ago

In terms of morality, which do you believe is more important -- the intention of an action, or the consequences of an action?

umka2103 [35]

In conclusion, a person's intentions are more important than the action's effects when determining wrongness. Since a moral judgment should be immune to luck, and effects are more affected by luck than intentions, the injustice of moral luck clearly leads to this conclusion.

Morality refers to the set of requirements that allow human beings to stay cooperatively in agencies. it's what societies determine to be “right” and “suited.” once in a while, appearing in a moral way manner individuals should sacrifice their own short-time period pursuits to advantage society.

Morality is the same old of society used to determine what is proper or incorrect conduct. An example of morality is the belief by a person that it is incorrect to take what would not belong to them, even though no person would understand.

Ethics and morals relate to “right” and “incorrect” conduct. whilst they are every so often used interchangeably, they are special: ethics seek advice from policies supplied by an outside supply, e.g., codes of conduct in workplaces or principles in religions. Morals refer to a man or woman's personal principles regarding right and wrong.

Learn more about morality here brainly.com/question/1326871

#SPJ4

8 0

2 years ago

What are a few of the positive things the Equal Rights Amendment would have done for women in America?

Novay_Z [31]

Answer:

Employment, property and family law.

Explanation:

The ERA has to be considered in its historical context. It was first proposed in 1923, at a time where women had little or no rights regarding work and payment and faced discrimination. The ERA proposed a total abolition of law discrimination based on sex, which would have been revolutionary at the time. Later, during the 1960s and 1970s when the ERA was again discussed, some of the problems were solved with other laws, like the Equal Pay Act or the Civil Rights Acts. However, while these acts are a key part of American Legislation, the ERA is a Constitutional Amendment, which would give a completely new level of protection.

There is criticism, mainly because many of the laws and guarantees gained during the past 100 years have been tailored to protect women in their specificity. And many fear that the ERA would negatively override those protections. However, as an Amendment, any discrimination based on sex could be challenged based on unconstitutionality. And as of now, women still suffer discrimination and the acts and laws enacted so far are not sufficient.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers