This "Necessary and Proper Clause" (sometimes also called the "Elastic Clause") grants Congress a set of so-called implied powers—that is, powers not explicitly named in the Constitution but assumed to exist due to their being necessary to implement the expressed powers that are named in Article I. The Bank's existence is a great example of implied powers: the Constitution doesn't say that Congress has the right to establish a bank, but its defenders claimed that one was necessary to carry out the Congress' power to collect taxes. Hope this helps.
Not completely sure but i would say it was a theocracy <span />
Sonia's concerns best align with those of the family decline perspective of family change.
The family decline perspective claim that the family is in a state of decline. The family decline perspective is the view that allowing divorces to occur more often and easily, economic decline, choosing work and school over marital settlement, having children outside marriage, having an increase in the number of people who cohabit, and allowing children to be raised in single parent households have damaged the institution of marriage.
The distinction drawn between the marital as well as the non marital children would then be under the Equal Protection Clause. The court will put immediately a scrutiny standard and would implement the action unless it is substantially related to a vital government interest
