Sit-ins and freedom rides advocated C. NON-VIOLENT PROTEST.
Non-violent protests or non-violent resistance is the practice of achieving goals such as social change through symbolic protests, civil disobedience, economic or political non-cooperation, or other methods without using violence.
Other methods of Nonviolent protests and persuasions are:
1) student strikes
2) sit-downs
3) turning one's back
4) vigils
5) "haunting" officials
6) disrobing
Answer:
Political Maps - does not show physical features. Instead, they show state and national boundaries and capital and major cities. Physical Maps - illustrate the physical features of an area, such as the mountains, rivers and lakes. Topographic Maps - include contour lines to show the shape and elevation of an area.
Explanation:
Interest groups are the group of people who attempt to influence public policy, it is also known as a pressure group, special interests groups, and lobbyests.
The purpose of interest groups is to shape public policy, bring awareness, represents shared attitudes instead of geography and provide information of the government. In the Mid 1800's interest group describe as anti-slavery, fraternals, and religions, in the late 1800s it describes business associations
Answer:
The Battle of Sitka (Russian: Сражение при Ситке; 1804) was the last major armed conflict between Russians and Alaska Natives, and was initiated in response to the destruction of a Russian trading post two years before. The primary combatant groups were the Kiks.ádi ("Ones of Kíks", Frog/Raven) Clan of Sheetʼká Xʼáatʼi (Baranof Island) of the Tlingit nation and agents of the Russian-American Company assisted by the Imperial Russian Navy.
The correct answer is students’ right to free speech in public schools.
In this Supreme Court, the issue of whether students have protected free speech in the schools as a result of actions by individuals like Mary Beth Tinker. Tinker, and some of her siblings/friends, wore black armbands to school with the peace sign on them. This expression was used to show the students anti-Vietnam War stance. Tinker was then punished by the school. After that, she brought her case to the legal system.
The Supreme Court ruled that this type of freedom of speech is protect because it does not disrupt the educational process.