Answer:
Nationalism and imperialism encouraged each European nation to pursue its own interests and compete for power. ... The alliance system pulled one nation after another into the conflict.
Explanation:
<span>Roger Williams was banished from Plymouth after being convicted of sedition and heresy. He had been a Puritan. Puritans were called "Separatists."
</span><span>Rhode Island was started as a place for religious freedom and for religious dissenters. Roger Williams did not believe that the Plymouth church was sufficiently separated from the Church of England; so you could say that he became is dissenter, but he actually was banished for his beliefs. Anne Hutchinson was also tried, excommunicated and banished from the Massachusetts Bay Colony for her beliefs. She also came to Rhode Island. </span>
The first inklings of socialism emerged in Switzerland and was created by a great philosopher, also known as Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
Explanation:
What was the goal of the Boston Port Bill of the 1770s? join the fight against the British in the French and Indian War.
Answer:
“I do think that if there were a long term—I don’t know, 18, 20 years, something like that, and it was fixed—I would say that was fine. In fact, it’d make my life a lot simpler, to tell you the truth.” – Justice Stephen Breyer1
“The Framers adopted life tenure at a time when people simply did not live as long as they do now. A judge insulated from the normal currents of life for twenty-five or thirty years was a rarity then, but is becoming commonplace today. Setting a term of, say, fifteen years would ensure that federal judges would not lose all touch with reality through decades of ivory tower existence. It would also provide a more regular and greater degree of turnover among the judges. Both developments would, in my view, be healthy ones.” – Future Chief Justice John Roberts2
The rules governing the U.S. Supreme Court must be updated to reflect the reality of life in modern America. The average tenure of a Supreme Court justice has significantly lengthened since the establishment of the federal judiciary in the 1700s, giving outsize power to nine individuals in a way the framers of the Constitution could never have imagined. This longevity has resulted in a lack of regularity in vacancies, introducing further randomness to the judicial selection process. As a result, the confirmation process for the highest court has become politically divisive, with extremely narrow votes and theatrics from the nominees themselves. This state of affairs is untenable; policymakers must address it by enacting legislation to create term limits for justices.
