Amanda and Stephen wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT inter
sects line segment MR forming four angles. Angles 1 and 3 are vertical angles. Angles 2 and 4 are vertical angles. Amanda's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠3 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠4 = ∠3 + ∠4 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality Stephen's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠2 + ∠3 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠2 = ∠2 + ∠3 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality
2 answers:
The answer:
the valid proof is <span>Amanda's.
</span><span>Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠4 = 180°
Definition of Supplementary
Angles ∠3 + ∠4 = 180°
Definition of Supplementary Angles
∠1 + ∠4 = ∠3 + ∠4
Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 </span>
You might be interested in
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
There is a positive correlation, as hours spent gets bigger the test score gets bigger with some outliers
Answer:
38
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
27+36=9 (3+7)
Step-by-step explanation:
27+36= 2(70+36)
Answer:
3.5 pounds
Step-by-step explanation:
divide the mass by 16
It would be:
1/6 < 3/8 < 0.625 < 75%