Amanda and Stephen wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT inter
sects line segment MR forming four angles. Angles 1 and 3 are vertical angles. Angles 2 and 4 are vertical angles. Amanda's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠3 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠4 = ∠3 + ∠4 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality Stephen's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠2 + ∠3 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠2 = ∠2 + ∠3 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality
2 answers:
The answer:
the valid proof is <span>Amanda's.
</span><span>Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠4 = 180°
Definition of Supplementary
Angles ∠3 + ∠4 = 180°
Definition of Supplementary Angles
∠1 + ∠4 = ∠3 + ∠4
Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 </span>
You might be interested in
Try everything you can find to see if you feel like its right
The inequality is < so 2/4 < 5/6.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Any non-parallel lines in the plane must intersect in one place; thus, there is one solution to the system of equations.
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
MARK AS BRAINLIEST!!
Answer:
15
Step-by-step explanation: