Amanda and Stephen wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT inter
sects line segment MR forming four angles. Angles 1 and 3 are vertical angles. Angles 2 and 4 are vertical angles. Amanda's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠3 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠4 = ∠3 + ∠4 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality Stephen's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠2 + ∠3 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠2 = ∠2 + ∠3 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality
2 answers:
The answer:
the valid proof is <span>Amanda's.
</span><span>Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠4 = 180°
Definition of Supplementary
Angles ∠3 + ∠4 = 180°
Definition of Supplementary Angles
∠1 + ∠4 = ∠3 + ∠4
Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 </span>
You might be interested in
Answer:
B) 120
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helpssssss
A. is 20ft I believe but I don't know the other one
Answer:
40 in 1 hour
320 in 8 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
D) 33
Step-by-step explanation:
64 - [(9 ÷ 3) + 4 x 7]
64 - [3 + 4 x 7]
64 - [ 3 + 28]
64 - 28 = 33
I'm sorry..................