Amanda and Stephen wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT inter
sects line segment MR forming four angles. Angles 1 and 3 are vertical angles. Angles 2 and 4 are vertical angles. Amanda's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠3 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠4 = ∠3 + ∠4 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality Stephen's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠2 + ∠3 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠2 = ∠2 + ∠3 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality
2 answers:
The answer:
the valid proof is <span>Amanda's.
</span><span>Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠4 = 180°
Definition of Supplementary
Angles ∠3 + ∠4 = 180°
Definition of Supplementary Angles
∠1 + ∠4 = ∠3 + ∠4
Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 </span>
You might be interested in
Answer:
e - surveys
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm not sure btw sorry but hope this can help
The commission percent is 4%
Take (commission / sales) *100
Answer:-3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
-2 2/6+5/6
-7/3 + 5/6
(2x-7+1x5) ➗ 6
(-14+5) ➗ 6
-9 ➗ 6
-9/6=-3/2
Answer:
i dont speak Spanish
Step-by-step explanation:
lol
Answer:
sheeeeeeeeeeeeeesh
Step-by-step explanation: