Amanda and Stephen wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT inter
sects line segment MR forming four angles. Angles 1 and 3 are vertical angles. Angles 2 and 4 are vertical angles. Amanda's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠3 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠4 = ∠3 + ∠4 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality Stephen's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠2 + ∠3 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠2 = ∠2 + ∠3 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality
2 answers:
The answer:
the valid proof is <span>Amanda's.
</span><span>Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠4 = 180°
Definition of Supplementary
Angles ∠3 + ∠4 = 180°
Definition of Supplementary Angles
∠1 + ∠4 = ∠3 + ∠4
Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 </span>
You might be interested in
Answer:
1120 ounces
Step-by-step explanation:
5 stone= 5*14 pounds= 70 pounds
70 pounds= 70*16 ounces= 1120 ounces
Answer:

<h3> I hoped this helps you ☺️☺️ </h3>
Thank you ☺️☺️
Answer:
2/9
Step-by-step explanation:
Since 1/3 of a box of chocolates costs 6 dollars, you can buy (4×(1/3))/6=2/9 of a box of chocolates!
i had to do the answer as a pic cuz my iPad is gonna die.
sorry <:)
Answer
DFE and FED
Step-by-step explanation: