Amanda and Stephen wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT inter sects line segment MR forming four angles. Angles 1 and 3 are vertical angles. Angles 2 and 4 are vertical angles. Amanda's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠3 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠4 = ∠3 + ∠4 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality Stephen's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠2 + ∠3 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠2 = ∠2 + ∠3 Transitive Property of Equality ∠1 ≅ ∠3 Subtraction Property of Equality
2 answers:
The answer:
You might be interested in
I believe The answer is B
Answer:
Ray WV and Ray WX.
Step-by-step explanation:
A ray is a line that has a fixed starting point, but no end points. It extends infinitely. You usually list points based on the way it is facing.
Hope this helps!
6+y
When the incident ray passes through the focal point, a light ray striking a concave concave mirror reflect off parallel to the principal axis. The correct option among all the options given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope the answer comes to your help.
