Answer:
foot-in-the-door
Explanation:
Foot-in-the-door technique: The foot-in-the-door technique is also referred to as FITD. This technique is defined as an individual making or posing a small request formerly to be able to ask for the bigger request from another person later on.
Example: In the question above, as Jennifer is making a small request for a ride to a nearby store and later on she asked for a ride to the attorney's office.
In other words, this is one of the compliance strategy which is directed towards getting an individual to agree for a big request by having the individual agree to a small request first.
The Reconstruction era is always a challenge to teach. First, it was a period of tremendous political complexity and far-reaching consequences. A cursory survey of Reconstruction is never satisfying, but a fuller treatment of Reconstruction can be like quick sand—easy to get into but impossible to get out of. Second, to the extent that students may have any preconceptions about Reconstruction, they are often an obstacle to a deeper understanding of the period. Given these challenges, I have gradually settled on an approach to the period that avoids much of the complex chronology of the era and instead focuses on the “big questions” of Reconstruction.
However important a command of the chronology of Reconstruction may be, it is equally important that students understand that Reconstruction was a period when American waged a sustained debate over who was an American, what rights should all Americans enjoy, and what rights would only some Americans possess. In short, Americans engaged in a strenuous debate about the nature of freedom and equality.
With the surrender of Confederate armies and the capture of Jefferson Davis in the spring of 1865, pressing questions demanded immediate answers.
Chief justice writes the court's opinion.
Chief justice presides also over the trial in the Senate. Also has a ceremonial duty of administering the oath of office of the President.
Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy, which gave a single person total power over the government and exempted the king from all checks and balances. On the other side, Locke endorsed a more liberal strategy for creating states.
What do the John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories of the social contract have in common?
Both Locke and Hobbes saw the social compact as being crucial to the political stability of a state. But each of these ideas was based on a very different understanding of human nature.
Why was Locke's viewpoint so much different than Hobbes?
The natural rules revealed by Locke exist in the state of nature, in opposition to Hobbes. Additionally, they are regarded as fundamental aspects of human nature since they violate people's right to personal freedom. A state of conflict is not the same as a state of nature.
Learn more about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories: brainly.com/question/1596903
#SPJ4
Answer:
Economics affects our daily lives in both obvious and subtle ways.
Explanation:
