Answer:
Im pretty sure ur answers would be
x= -32/27 and X= -46/27
Step-by-step explanation:
So srry if im wrong tho
Answer:
See explanation below
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, a director of manufacturing must convince management that a proposed manufacturing method reduces costs before the new method can be implemented. The current production method operates with a mean cost of $220 per hour.
a) The alternative and null hypotheses would be:
H0: μ ≥ 220
Ha: μ < 220
b) Comment on the conclusion when H0 cannot be rejected:
When we fail to reject the null hypothesis H0, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method cannot be implemented.
c) Comment on the conclusion when H0 can be rejected:
When the null hypothesis, H0 is rejected, there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method can be implemented.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Ok so the first one is X<31/3
And the second one is X>-5
Answer:
Choice B: 
.
Step-by-step explanation:
For a parabola with vertex 
, the vertex form equation of that parabola in would be:
.
In this question, the vertex is 
, such that 
and 
. There would exist a constant 
such that the equation of this parabola would be:
.
The next step is to find the value of the constant .
Given that this parabola includes the point 
, 
and 
would need to satisfy the equation of this parabola, .
Substitute these two values into the equation for this parabola:
.
Solve this equation for :
.
.
Hence, the equation of this parabola would be:
.
