Answer:
This is an opinion!
Explanation:
Okay, so we all know the Articals of Confederation were too weak and it made the government crumble. Shay's Rebellion is what proved this. So it's obvious the government needs to change, but should you keep the Articals?? That is your opinion.
If completely scrap:
"Hello, my fellow delegates. We all know the Articals of Confederation is not the best work. We can't fund the army, states are going against each other, and the people are all rather poor. There is no way we can fix this without starting over! There is no way we can stand by this without our government crumbling. We all worked so hard to have life liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, but we can only have that if our government is stronger."
If just revise:
"Hello, my fellow delegates. We all know the Articals of Confederation is not our best work, but we can't just scrap it completely! We only need to edit it. It has it's pros, like declaring war! We can't have too strong of a government, or else all we fought for would be for nothing! The Articals were thoughtfully written out, and just scrapping it would be a complete waste."
Either one is fine, you can use whichever! Try rewriting it in your own words, and be creative. Hope this helps! :))
Answer:
American Samoa
Explanation:
American Samoa became an U.S. territory around the 1900s
Answer:
The binding price floor will cause a surplus of wheat that farmers will be unable to sell.
Explanation:
The price floor is the lowest price that can be paid for goods, by binding price floor the senator requires by law a price for the goods above the equilibrium. The critics would say that since the wheat is binded price floor and cannot drop below the price stated by the senator, when the government inflate the price for the market the consumers will deny to pay the price stated and by that the consumption of wheat would fall creating a surplus of wheat, since the goods won’t be sold.
