1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrew-mc [135]
3 years ago
5

This was an agreement that California would be admitted to the Union, the slave trade in the District of Columbia would be restr

icted, and the Fugitive Slave Law would be enforced.
Social Studies
2 answers:
avanturin [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Compromise of 1850

Explanation:

The Compromise of 1850, between Southern slave-holding interests and Northern Free-Soilers, was meant to resolve conflicts over slavery in territory obtained in the Mexican-American War (1846-48).

The compromise consisted of laws recognizing California as a free state, abolishing the slave trade in the District of Columbia, and the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act.

Arada [10]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Compromise Of 1850 is da answer

</span>
You might be interested in
As a Populist Georgia politician, Tom Watson would have been MOST likely to support causes of what?
Burka [1]

Answer:

Farmers and the working class

5 0
3 years ago
El concepto de alfabetización académica​
andreev551 [17]

Answer:

Honestly, not sure either. I don't think there is an actual scientific reason.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the Black Death most contribute to the end of feudalism
ella [17]
It stopped people from trading and it weakened the society

5 0
3 years ago
CAN U HELP ME QUICK PPPPPPLLLLLLZZZZ I AM GIVING U 50 POINTS IF U HELP ME ON THIS QUESTION PPPLLLLLZ HELP ME AND QUICKLY DO IT
GalinKa [24]
I would guess it to be 'a' as most of the country is run by the government
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The United Nations has acknowledged the existence of 192 nation-states as of 2006. If the United Nations were to acknowledge nat
Artyom0805 [142]
 This number would greatly increase, as there are many nations that don't have their own their own country. Some are part of a bigger country (the Tamils in India) and some are distributed among many countries (the Kurds)

Recognizing all those nations could increase some conflicts, such as that between the Kurds and Turkish in Turkey.
I think that a good definition should acknowledge that  some nations have independent states and some are part of another state - the defining characteristics should be a sense of unity among the nation.


8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What might have happened if Christopher
    5·2 answers
  • Sorting students has proven to be entirely beneficial. True / false
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement about the narrator of “Homesick” is correct? The narrator's perspective on America is shaped by her background,
    5·2 answers
  • What is the definition of map scale
    12·2 answers
  • True or False: Conference committees are created to negotiate a compromise on a similar bills in both the house and the senate,
    12·2 answers
  • Which of these civilizations were likely to have had contact with each other and why? 1. Ancient Egypt 2. India 3. China 4. Midd
    14·1 answer
  • Fill in the blanks plz
    15·1 answer
  • Which action BEST describes how interest groups would promote change in your town?
    6·1 answer
  • 1
    14·1 answer
  • Who would argue that even if you are crippled or blind how you choose to respond to that is freedom?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!