Explanation:
Point-wise explanation is given below:
i) The anti-defection law was introduced to curb the growing trend of elected representatives who changed political parties to become ministers or to get cash rewards.
ii) The affidavit requirement was an order passed by the Supreme Court as a measure to curb the challenge of money and muscle power.
iii) The third reform measure was made by the Election Commission where for all political parties it was mandatory to hold regular elections and also file their income tax returns.
<u><em>Besides these, many suggestions are often made to reform political parties:</em></u>
iv) It should be made mandatory for political parties to give a minimum number of tickets, about one-third, to women candidates. Similarly, there should be a quota for women in the decision-making bodies of the party.
v) There should be state funding of elections. The government should give parties money to support their election expenses. This support could be given in kind: petrol, paper, telephone etc. Or it could be given in cash on the basis of the votes secured by the party in the last election.
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em>Hope the answer helps you!!</em>
<em>Happy Answering!!</em>
<em>Be Brainly!!</em>
No if it is required to give out a union address you have to do it no matter what the public thinks
Since political speech<span> is more important than commercial </span>speech, it stands to reason it would be entitled to the strongest protection<span> the First Amendment can provide.</span>
I hope my response satisfies your query. Have a good one :)
This is a question that refers to philosophical utilitarianism.
It is the search for the maximum happiness and pleasure, with the least possible suffering, but with an implicit moral question. When we are led to the feeling of pain or pleasure, we determine the way forward and know what is right or wrong.
In this way, it is possible that we are facing a moral dilemma. In our quest for happiness or minimizing our pain, our actions can impact others. That is, utilitarianism is essentially a teleological and consequentialist theory. Therefore, we must seek the impartial maximization of the happiness of all affected by our attitudes, regardless of the affective ties.
I’m pretty sure it is C :))
