Answer: a
Explanation:
Opportunity costs represent the benefits an individual, investor or business misses out on when choosing one alternative over another. While financial reports do not show opportunity cost, business owners can use it to make educated decisions when they have multiple options before them.
Because by definition they are unseen, opportunity costs can be easily overlooked if one is not careful. Understanding the potential missed opportunities foregone by choosing one investment over another allows for better decision-making.
Opportunity cost analysis also plays a crucial role in determining a business's capital structure. While both debt and equity require expense to compensate lenders and shareholders for the risk of investment, each also carries an opportunity cost. Funds used to make payments on loans, for example, are not being invested in stocks or bonds, which offer the potential for investment income. The company must decide if the expansion made by the leveraging power of debt will generate greater profits than it could make through investments.
Answer:
(a)70 years
(b)23.33 years
(c)8.75 years
Explanation:
According to the Rule of 70, for a given interest rate x, funds double in 
years.
(a)For a savings account earning 1% interest per year,
The number of years it will take the fund to double= 
=70 years
(b)For a U.S. Treasury bond mutual fund earning 3% interest per year.
The number of years it will take the fund to double= 
=23.33 years
(c)For a stock market mutual fund earning 8% interest per year.
The number of years it will take the fund to double= 
=8.75 years
Answer:
The answer is: D) Fire the player. The team may suffer financially at first, but if the public has faith in the organization, the team and the league will benefit in the long run. If the owner keeps the tape a secret and the public finds out about his actions, the team - and society - will suffer harm from the loss of public trust.
Explanation:
Akers firmly believed that ethics were fundamental to economic competitiveness. He argued that without ethical behavior, individuals, corporations and society as a whole couldn´t be economically competitive.
So in this case, he would have simply terminated the player´s contract without regarding any of the potential downsides for the team.
