Well here’s why it shouldn’t be allowed, it could cause distractions to other people around you or to yourself or people could hide stuff inside of them food etc.
Here’s why it should be allowed. some people feel more comfortable wearing one and I feel like that’s really the only reasonable reason for someone to wear one.
Answer:
d. price competition is especially vigorous, buyers have low switching costs, and the majority of industry sales are made to a few, large volume buyers.
Explanation:
Michael Porter specified 4 generic strategies for gaining competitive advantage, which are namely,
1. Cost Focus
2. Differentiation Focus
3. Cost Leadership
4. Differentiation
Cost leadership refers to charging lowest price and attaining cost advantage in the industry.
Differentiation refers to designing products with unique attributes.
Striving to be low cost provider would be most attractive when the buyers have low switching costs i.e it is easier and cheap to switch between products and wherein buyers are large and exercise considerable bargaining power.
Thus, the correct option is (d). price competition is especially vigorous, buyers have low switching costs, and the majority of industry sales are made to a few, large volume buyers.
Answer:
$71,000
Explanation:
The computation of operating income is shown below:-
Total costs if company bought = Cost of production × Outside supplier per unit) + (Fixed cost × Remaining percentage)
= (43,000 × $3.80) + ($68,000 × (100% - 30%))
= (43,000 × $3.80) + ($68,000 × 70%)
= $163,400 + $47,600
= $211,000
Loss in Income if part is bought = Total costs if company bought - Total costs originally
= $211,000 - $140,000
= $71,000
Therefore, Making profit will be more by $71,000 and for computing the Loss in Income if part is bought we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
