1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
djyliett [7]
3 years ago
5

After the release of radioactive material into the atmosphere from a nuclear power plant in a country in 1984​, the hay in that

country was contaminated by a radioactive isotope​ (half-life 8 ​days). If it is safe to feed the hay to cows when 14​% of the radioactive isotope​ remains, how long did the farmers need to wait to use this​ hay?
Mathematics
1 answer:
AlexFokin [52]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

23 days.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the original amount of radioactive material be 100.

We have been given that the half life of a radioactive material is 8 days. It is safe to feed the hay to cows when 14​% of the radioactive isotope​ remains. We are asked to find the number of days, the farmers need to wait to use the radioactive contaminated​ hay.

We will use half-life formula to solve our given problem.

A=a\cdot (\frac{1}{2})^{\frac{t}{h}}, where,

A = Amount left after t time,

a = Initial amount,

h = Half-life.

14% of 100 would be 14.

14=100\cdot (\frac{1}{2})^{\frac{t}{8}}

\frac{14}{100}=\frac{100\cdot (0.5)^{\frac{t}{8}}}{100}

0.14=(0.5)^{\frac{t}{8}}

Now, we will take natural log of both sides.

\text{ln}(0.14)=\text{ln}((0.5)^{\frac{t}{8}})

Using natural log property \text{ln}(a^b)=b\cdot \text{ln}(a), we will get:

\text{ln}(0.14)=\frac{t}{8}\times \text{ln}(0.5)

\text{ln}(0.14)=\frac{t\times \text{ln}(0.5)}{8}

\frac{\text{ln}(0.14)}{\text{ln}(0.5)}=\frac{t\times \text{ln}(0.5)}{8\times \text{ln}(0.5)}

\frac{-1.966112856}{-0.69314718055}=\frac{t}{8}

2.836501267=\frac{t}{8}

\frac{t}{8}=2.836501267

\frac{t}{8}*8=2.836501267*8

t=22.6920101377

t\approx 23

Therefore, the farmers need to wait for 23 days.

You might be interested in
Check whether the relation R on the set S = {1, 2, 3} is an equivalent
kozerog [31]

Answer:

R isn't an equivalence relation. It is reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let S denote a set of elements. S \times S would denote the set of all ordered pairs of elements of S\!.

For example, with S = \lbrace 1,\, 2,\, 3 \rbrace, (3,\, 2) and (2,\, 3) are both members of S \times S. However, (3,\, 2) \ne (2,\, 3) because the pairs are ordered.

A relation R on S\! is a subset of S \times S. For any two elementsa,\, b \in S, a \sim b if and only if the ordered pair (a,\, b) is in R\!.

 

A relation R on set S is an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following:

  • Reflexivity: for any a \in S, the relation R needs to ensure that a \sim a (that is: (a,\, a) \in R.)
  • Symmetry: for any a,\, b \in S, a \sim b if and only if b \sim a. In other words, either both (a,\, b) and (b,\, a) are in R, or neither is in R\!.
  • Transitivity: for any a,\, b,\, c \in S, if a \sim b and b \sim c, then a \sim c. In other words, if (a,\, b) and (b,\, c) are both in R, then (a,\, c) also needs to be in R\!.

The relation R (on S = \lbrace 1,\, 2,\, 3 \rbrace) in this question is indeed reflexive. (1,\, 1), (2,\, 2), and (3,\, 3) (one pair for each element of S) are all elements of R\!.

R isn't symmetric. (2,\, 3) \in R but (3,\, 2) \not \in R (the pairs in \! R are all ordered.) In other words, 3 isn't equivalent to 2 under R\! even though 2 \sim 3.

Neither is R transitive. (3,\, 1) \in R and (1,\, 2) \in R. However, (3,\, 2) \not \in R. In other words, under relation R\!, 3 \sim 1 and 1 \sim 2 does not imply 3 \sim 2.

3 0
3 years ago
Students were going to a play. The students who paid in advance only had to pay $32, but the students who paid at the door had t
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

64

Step-by-step explanation:

SInce the students at the door had to pay twice as much as the students who payed in advance, you would do 32*2=64

7 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help me ASAP
Natasha2012 [34]
7^2 +6 ^2= 85
Square root of 85 = 9.219544457

Answer : 9.2
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone please help me!!!
egoroff_w [7]
The correct answer is the first one(a): To get the system B,..., the first equation multiplied by 4...

Explanation:

1. Let us first multiple the first equation in System A with 4, we would get:
4(2x - y) = 4 * 3

=> 8x - 4y = 12 --- (A)

Now add the equation (A) and the second equation of System A:

8x  - 4y = 12
3x + 4y = 10
------------------
11x = 22 

Hence,
System B:
2x - y = 3
11x = 22

-i
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is an equivalent ratio to 8:20 and<br> 2:5?
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

4:10.

Step-by-step explanation:

4:10 would be one.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does it mean when there is an open circle on a graph?
    6·1 answer
  • From 65 to 144 find each percent increase round to the nearest percent.
    14·2 answers
  • You are trying to recreate flubber because you are obsessed with that movie and you thought it was the coolest. you take 70% sli
    11·1 answer
  • Somebody, please help! This is my exam.
    12·2 answers
  • How many solutions 9x +2y =9 / -3x + y=2
    5·1 answer
  • What two numbers have a product of 34 and a sum of 19?
    12·1 answer
  • Two numbers that multiply to 7 and add to -4​
    8·1 answer
  • Is 2.73234(34 repeating) rational or irrational?
    7·1 answer
  • Please help! I’ll also give brainliest! Thank you!
    10·1 answer
  • The link is attached do your best to figure it out.
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!