All categories

3 years ago

Is ABC~LMN?If so, name which similarity postulate or theorem applies.

Mathematics

2 answers:

Hitman42 [59]3 years ago

7 0

The answer is variant A.
Because:
if the two angles of a triangle are congruent to two angles of the other triangle , this triangles are similar

Ray Of Light [21]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

(A) Similar- AA

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: ΔABC is similar to ΔLMN

To find: Similarity postulate

Solution:

Two triangles are similar either by two angles or by one angle or two sides or by two angles and one side.

In this question it is given that two angles are equal, thus

In ΔABC and ΔLMN, we have

∠A=∠L=50° (Given)

∠B=∠M=75°(Given)

Thus, by AA similarity postulate,

ΔABC is similar to ΔLMN.

Hence, both the given triangles are similar by the option A postulate that is AA similarity postulate.

You might be interested in

Rewrite each expression using the distributive property.<br> 1. (a X 4) + (a x 3) =

Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

(a x 4)+(a x 3)=7a

Step-by-step explanation:

(a x 4)+(a x 3)= 4a+3a

(a x 4)+(a x 3)=7a

or does your question means something else??

3 0

3 years ago

(05.07 MC)

True [87]

I think 10.24 sq. ft

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A foresting service conducted a survey to see if tree farms that planted hardwood trees were more profitable over a 30-year peri

Advocard [28]

Answer:

The results are statistically significant because planting hardwood trees have a higher profit per acre.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question above,

It shows that hardwood trees had a 46% higher Profit per acre than softwood trees.

Meaning that for every $100 made on softwood trees, $146 profit would be made on hardwood trees i(including both primary and secondary expenses; making the hardwood trees more profitable.

The information given is enough to reach a conclusion that planting hardwood trees have a higher profit per acre than softwood trees.

8 0

3 years ago

4/5 minus 1/3 plz i need help

IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

7/15

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1

We can't subtract two fractions with different denominators. So you need to get a common denominator. To do this, you'll multiply the denominators times each other... but the numerators have to change, too. They get multiplied by the other term's denominator.

So we multiply 4 by 3, and get 12.

Then we multiply 1 by 5, and get 5.

Next we give both terms new denominators -- 5 × 3 = 15.

So now our fractions look like this:

−

Step 2

Since our denominators match, we can subtract the numerators.

12 − 5 = 7

So the answer is:

Step 3

Last of all, we need to simplify the fraction, if possible. Can it be reduced to a simpler fraction?

To find out, we try dividing it by 2...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 3...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 5...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 7...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 11...

No good. 11 is larger than 7. So we're done reducing.

6 0

2 years ago

What is 53.67 to one decimal place

MAXImum [283]

53.67 to one decimal place is 53.7 since you round the .6 to the .7

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers