Go to the room with no windows on the ground floor or basement and bring a radio
I believe the answer is: causality.
The initial assumption above is that a teenager who use drugs would most likely influence other non-users to use drug. There is nothing from the finding that disprove otherwise. So, when user hang out with non-users, there is a pretty good chance that the non-users could influence the users to stop consuming the drug.
Answer:
insecure attachment
Explanation:
Insecure attachment: The term insecure attachment refers to the relationship style in which the bond between two people is being adulterated through the consequences of fear.
This is caused due to the unwillingness of any sort of relationship that carries various emotions including rejection and dependence.
Psychologists believe that insecure attachment is mostly developed in the early childhood period of a person's life.
A parent might avoid, reject, or ignore the child's need then there's a probability of the child getting or experiencing insecure attachment.
In the question above, Marissa's daughter is most likely to display signs of insecure attachment.
Answer:
Directionality
Explanation:
Directionality can be a problem in correlational research. This can occur when a study shows that two variables are related, but the researcher has a hard time understanding which variable is the cause and which is the effect. In this example, the researcher might not know whether people who are more exposed to violence become more violent, or whether violent people are more likely to seek out violence in media.
