I'm not really sure because I have not done this in a while but I think True
Step-by-step explanation:
...
The correct answer is that the y -axiz shows exponential increase, not a linear increase. Instead of counting consecutively by ones or twos, the y -axis goes from 1 to 2 to 4 to 8 (multiplying by 2). This will result in data that looks closer together than it actually is, and therefore is misleading.
Answer:
84
Step-by-step explanation:
is x 140
---- SO ... ------- = --------
of 60 100
(hit like pls)
60*140=100x
8400=100x
/100 /100
-------------------
84 = x
<em>Greetings from Brasil...</em>
According to the statement, one figure is scaled in relation to another, so we can apply similarity to polygons.....
So
BIG/small = BIG/small
or
small/BIG = small/BIG
27/X = 45/35
OR
35/45 = X/27
27/X = 45/35
45X = 27·35
45X = 945
X = 945/45
<h2>X = 21</h2>
