Alexis de tocqueville referred to the ability of the majority in a democracy to impose its will on everyone else as <u>"the tyranny of the majority".</u>
The idea of the tyranny of the majority was advanced by the nineteenth century political scholars Alexis de Tocqueville (Democracy in America) and John Stuart Mill (On Liberty). It alludes to a circumstance in which the greater part implements its will on a distraught minority through the equitable procedure. That is the thing that various minority bunches in the UK are encountering after Leave won the submission. Unexpectedly, this result has hurt the interests of the minority, as well as that of the dominant part that bolstered Brexit.
Answer: 2 & 4
Explanation:
Variable expenses, also called variable costs, are expenses that can change over time. These costs vary depending on your usage of products or services, and they can change depending on any number of factors.
Source: Google Search Engine (First Result)
- Loans change overtime the more you pay them
- Apartment rent depends on how many resources you (e.g. Water, Electricity)
Note:
I'm not 100% sure about the answer I gave, because it's a really vague case.
The correct answer is B.
<u>Therefore the appropiate null and alternative hypothesis are the following:</u>
. H 0 : p 1 = p 2
H 1 : p 1 ≠ p 2
The aim of the test would be to conclude whether H0 should be rejected or not at a 10% significance level.
<u>In this case a billateral significance test needs to be conducted,</u> as such a test consists on testing the equality of the test value with a given value. In this case the H0 would be rejected if the test value is significanly different, both in the case that it is superior or inferior.
On the contrary, an unilateral significance test would have been conducted if aiming to check whether a value is superior or equal to the test value (left unilateral) or inferior or equal to this value (right unilateral).
Then, the result of the test is the one stated: rejecting H0 at the 10% significance level.
