Answer:
9
Step-by-step explanation:
7+2=9 goofy
Answer:
The answer js 203 inches and this is the answer because the teacher said it js correct and it will be the correct one
Answer:
−b4+2b2+35
Step-by-step explanation:
b2+5)(−b2+7)
=(b2)(−b2)+(b2)(7)+(5)(−b2)+(5)(7)
=−b4+7b2−5b2+35
Answer:
x=1
Step-by-step explanation:
×+10=11
-10 -10
x = 1
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
