Answer:
No, I do not think it was necessary.
Explanation:
The Sedition act was uncharacteristic of the initial thoughts of the forefathers of the United States because it went against the freedom of speech and freedom of press. Although it seemed to be a quick fix to stop dissention in the U.S. with anti war sentiment, it also invalidated the very constitution for which the U.S stood on. There could have been better ways to handle it such as educating the public better on what exactly was happening, and why we might as a country needed to become involved in the war.
Philosophers and other thinkers had many different ideas and propositions about the possible connection between reason and the physical world. One of them is the one you've posted, however, that doesn't mean it's universally recognized or true.
Https://www.google.com/search?q=MALCOLM+X+protests&client=firefox-b-1&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=...:
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that he is also known for having a grandson that also ruled for 61 years.
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
