Answer:
unconstitutional because of its excessive approach.
Explanation:
As you may already know, all US states are subject to federal laws, which must be obeyed throughout the United States. However, all states in the country have the autonomy to formulate their own legislation that will be valid for the entire territory of the state, as long as it does not go against any federal law. There is a federal regulation that states that it is not allowed to hinder or prevent interstate commerce. From this we can state that the statute created and approved by the state of Vermont, which prohibits the sale of any maple syrup not produced in Vermont, is unconstitutional.
This statute is unconstitutional because, in addition to having an excessive approach, it goes against a federal norm.
Answer: states from passing laws that contradict federal law
Explanation: It establishes a way to change the Constitution.
It establishes rights for citizens in different states.
It establishes a foundation for government.
It establishes relationships between states.
Answer:
Hypothesis.
Explanation:
A hypothesis can be defined as a testable statement that describes the circumstances that might happen in a particular situation. It shows the outcome of the experiment or the study that is to be performed.
Hypothesis also shows the relationship between dependent and independent variables. Dependent variables are the variable that the researcher measures and independent variables are the ones that the researcher changes.
So, in the given scenario, the Milan systemic therapist will prepare a hypothesis to explain the scenario of Ben's behavior.
So, the correct answer is a hypothesis.
