For question 3. A
4. A
5. B
Answer:
inductive; weak
Step-by-step explanation:
The argument is inductive because the main point of the argument or theory was presented later at the end of the argument, after opening the argument with anecdotal evidence or observations. However, no matter how true the premises may seem to be, the argument is weak, because the conclusion is false and does not really follow from the premises. Nothing in her premises suggests consulting her textbook during final exams is acceptable. Consulting textbook during exams is certainly a prohibited act, and as such, is not the best way to refresh her memory.
Answer:
The given table is
Hours. Earnings per hour.
0
4
8
12
Now, the unit rate is $8.25 per hour, according to the proble, this is the constant ratio of change, that means, we only need to multiply the number of hours with the unit rate.
<h3>Therefore, the complete table is</h3>
Hours. Earnings per hour.
0 0
4 33
8 66
12 99
<span>Cancel <span>r2</span>
</span><span><span><span>(s4t)</span>/(</span><span>s<span>t3)</span></span></span>
2 <span>Use Quotient Rule: <span><span><span>xa/</span><span>xb</span></span>=<span>x^<span>a−b</span></span></span>
</span><span><span>s^<span>4−1</span></span><span>t^<span>1−3</span></span></span>
3 <span>Simplify <span>4−1</span> to 3
</span><span><span>s^3</span><span>t^<span>1−3</span></span></span>
4 <span>Simplify <span>1−3</span> to <span>−2</span>
</span><span><span>s^3</span><span>t^<span>−2</span></span></span>
5 <span>Use Negative Power Rule:<span><span>x^<span>−a</span></span>=<span>1/<span>xa</span></span></span>
</span><span><span>s^3</span>×<span>1/<span>t2</span></span></span>
6 <span>Simplify
</span><span><span>(s3)/(</span><span>t2)</span></span>
Done so the answer is a. then
Answer:
$150.
Step-by-step explanation:
You would add to get the answer.
57 + 90 = 150.
Feel free to let me know if you need more help. :)
