All categories

3 years ago

When an actor turns to speak directly to the audience, unheard by the other characters, it is known as an "aside"?

1 answer:

7 0

This statement is true.
An aside is a term which refers to a line or a monologue that one of the characters in the play is addressing to the audience directly. It is a form of 'breaking the fourth wall' because the character knows they are being watched by an audience and is speaking to them explicitly. That statement is known as an aside in drama terminology.

You might be interested in

Which technique is most widely used by therapists to help clients recover lost childhood memories? hypnosis "truth" serum gestal

Oduvanchick [21]

The most widely used by therapist in recovering childhood memories is hypnosis. Hypnosis is a way of having a person be placed in a state of concentration, in order for the person to respond to suggestions. It enables a person remember the past and the things that had happened on his or her past. That makes it usable in recovering childhood memories.

3 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!

notka56 [123]

Although the times have changed, exist similar factors that were part of the history of two big power countries: Rome and the United States. Being these important historical facts of each country described now.

On the one hand, the Roman republic was managed by a monarch king “Tarquino the superb”, who used the murders and violence to establish the order in Rome. After many injustices caused by him, one of them did the Senate decided to act and rejected him because he let to his son to rope a Patrice. When the Senate combated the Monarch the consul charge was created, replacing the king charge, and the main goal was administrated the roman Justice. To avoid abuses they created different branches to achieve it. However, Rome practiced slavery until the fall of the Roman Empire. The slaveries were treated like economic instruments, but the democratic advance let the laws’ implementation, duties, and rights established by the Senate brought equality for its population.

On the other hand, currently the United States is governed by the democratic constitution and its laws are established by the federal government which is dived in the legislative and executive branch which creates federal, official and politic laws and these are approved by the judicial branch, which belongs to Senate; the implementation of each law must not be against the constitution. Its application relapse on minor charges like policemen. The United States also practiced the slavery above all with black people and this caused a division between the North, where people rejected it, and the south, where it was legal and people practiced it.

Similarities and differences

- As the United States as Rome created different branches to avoid the unfair, the abuse to population and support the democracy.

- The United States’ Senate originated thanks to the creation of Rome’s senate.

- Rome was a power dominant country over 2.000 years ago and the United States is a powerful country nowadays.

- Both countries are multicultural and practiced slavery in a time.

In conclusion, even though both countries are different, as in culture, location and time, both have been big power countries economically and with big military forces, that have increased their culture, knowledge and general develop through the years. Part of their development has had the same achievements, like the politic and have looked for social equality to improve their internal development.

8 0

3 years ago

Put the events in the proper order. A Asoka converts to Buddhism due to suffering in Kalinga. B Asoka creates pillars to tell su

nataly862011 [7]

Answer:

The correct order is as follows:

1. Asoka struggles with brothers for the throne, then kills brothers and wins the throne.

2. Asoka holds power, and then attacks Kalinga to extend the kingdom.

3. Asoka regrets bloodshed in Kalinga.

4. Asoka converts to Buddhism due to suffering in Kalinga.

5. Asoka creates pillars to tell subjects of three morals laws and makes the kingdom a better place to live.

Explanation:

To conquer the privileged position, Asoka executed his 99 siblings. However, from that point forward, Asoka changed over to Buddhism since he lamented of all slaughter during assaults in Kalinga, one of his battles.

Furthermore, as a Buddhist sovereign, he accepted that Buddhism is valuable for every single individual, so he assembled various laws to make the kingdom a superior spot to live.

7 0

3 years ago

Dominican philosopher Thomas Aquinas was a teacher at the University of Paris.

Margaret [11]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Dominican philosopher Thomas Aquinas was a teacher at the University of Paris.

Thomas Aquinas was an Italian Dominican friar, philosopher, Catholic priest, and Doctor of the Church. He studied at the university of Paris and was known as an influential philosopher, theologian, and jurist in the tradition of scholasticism. He was ordained in Cologne Germany in 1250 after which he became a teacher at the university of Paris. He is the the father of the Thomistic school of theology.

6 0

3 years ago

Why did the constitution grant congress the power to create "inferior courts��? the builders of the constitution ensured the ex

Neko [114]

Congress and the Judiciary Act of 1789<span>

When the First Congress turned to the organization of the judicial branch, much of the debate centered on whether to establish lower federal courts or to rely on existing state courts to exercise federal jurisdiction. Advocates of a strong central government thought a national system of federal courts was an essential requirement for energetic government. Other members of Congress, recalling the colonial experience under British rule, thought that justice was best served by courts tied to local communities. Those who were suspicious of the concentration of national power wanted to grant state courts authority to hear all cases involving federal law or to limit local federal courts to admiralty and maritime law. The judiciary act approved in September 1789 established a federal court system with broad jurisdiction, but the act reserved a significant role for state courts and guaranteed that the diversity of legal traditions throughout the country would be recognized in the local federal courts.

The Judiciary Act of 1789 established three types of federal courts. The Supreme Court, with a chief justice and five associate justices, would meet twice a year in the nation’s capital and hear appeals from lower federal courts and from the state supreme courts. The Supreme Court would also exercise the limited original jurisdiction defined by the Constitution. In each state and in Kentucky and Maine (then parts of other states), a district court with a single judge would have exclusive jurisdiction to hear cases involving admiralty and maritime law and conduct trials of minor federal crimes. The district courts shared with the state courts jurisdiction over small suits brought by the United States.

The most important federal cases would be initiated in the third type of court, called circuit courts, which would convene in the same judicial districts in which the district courts met. The circuit courts had no judges of their own, but were served by two Supreme Court justices and the local district judge. (Congress soon revised the law to require only one justice on each circuit court.) Congress grouped the judicial districts into regional circuits for the purpose of assigning justices to serve on the circuit courts within that region. The circuit courts would hear some appeals from the district courts, but they were primarily trial courts. The circuit courts had exclusive jurisdiction over serious federal crimes and shared with the state courts jurisdiction over suits involving disputes above a certain monetary value, suits involving the U.S. government, and suits between citizens of different states.

Congress protected distinctive state legal traditions by drawing the judicial districts to coincide with state boundaries and by providing for the use of the respective state’s rules for most district and circuit court proceedings and for the selection of federal juries. Perhaps most important for protection of regional legal cultures, the assignment of “circuit riding” duties for Supreme Court justices ensured that the judges on the nation’s highest court would learn about local legal procedures and would interact with citizens at the point where cases entered the federal judicial system. The Judiciary Act also promoted a local orientation of the lower courts by requiring district judges to live in the district where they served. In response to widespread concerns that defendants in federal trials would be forced to appear in distant courts, the Judiciary Act required civil trials to be held in the district in which a defendant was served with a writ and trials involving the death penalty to be held in the county where the crime occurred.

I hope all this helps I am taking judicial law in school .
</span>

4 0

3 years ago