hi
if x= 2+4y-5 then x-2 +5 = 4y so y = (x-2+5) /4 = ( x+3) /4
conclusion y = (x+3)/4
Answer: 3rd option
Step-by-step explanation: The answer would be the third option. Let's go through each one and explain why it's correct or incorrect. First of all, our function is y = x - 3 so we can plug numbers into our X and Y. If we follow the function y = x - 3, we have 8 = 10 - 3 which is incorrect for the first one so that can't be it. For the nest one, we have 13 = 10 - 3 which also does not make sense. For the third one, we have 7 = 10 - 3 which is correct. And the last one, we have 3 = 10 - 2 which is wrong. Therefore, the third option is the answer.
Reasons:
1. Because, MO cuts Angle PMN in two equal parts.
2.As ∠PMN is cut in to equal parts thus:
∠PMN = ∠NMO + ∠PMO, where these two parts (∠NMO, ∠PMO) are equal.
3. Both are the same, common you can say..
4. Because, MO cuts Angle PON in two equal parts.
5. As ∠PON is cut in to equal parts thus:
∠PON = ∠NOM + ∠POM, where these two parts (∠NOM , ∠POM) are equal.
6. From the above statements, we have:
= ∠NMO + ∠PMO (Proved)
= ∠NOM + ∠POM (Proved)
= MO = MO (Proved)
Thus, ∆PMO ≅ ∆NMO, by AAS rule
________________________________
As simpoool as that!
Answer:
86000000
Step-by-step explanation:
86000000
Move the decimal point 7 places to the left.
8.6000000*107
Answer:
8.6 x10^7
^So it's 86000000
Answer:
l(l - 2) = 168
Step-by-step explanation:
Let w = width
Let l = length
Let A = area
w = l - 2
A = l * w
also, A = 168
equating the two values of A
l * w = 168
l * (l - 2) = 168
l^2 - 2l = 168
l(l - 2) = 168
