Answer:
moral reasoning
Explanation:
Moral reasoning is a study in philosophy known as moral philosophy which also overlaps in studies in psychology known as moral development. Moral reasoning is critical analysis to events that may have to deal with moral dilemmas to determine what is morally wrong or right in such situations. Logic and moral theories are typically applied to these analysis(such as utilitarianism) to break down and clarify moral events.
As far as I could find, the following were a feature of the reformin 1996:
increased work requirements (especially after two years)
a five-year limit on benefits from federal funds
So these were definitely a feature.
Of the remaining two, it is true that the cash assistance was diminished in 1996.
So i think that the transportation vouchers were not provided. Additionally, I found that transportation costs can be deducted from taxes by the employers, and that there is a number of smaller programs providing transportation benefits, but I don't think that they were a major part of the reform (so the last option).
It is due to the influence of the audiences.
Globalization in essence is companies and governments climbing onto the world stage and interacting internationally.
Globalization has helped some, but it has also hurt a lot, specifically through:
- Making the rich richer
- Removing trade barriers only for new ones to rise (VAT taxes, etc.)
- Increased trade deficits with many jobs leaving their developed nations for less developed ones (U.S. manufacturing to China, etc.)
- Developed country job pay cuts
- MNC's leaving countries and exploiting international tax havens
- MNC's overseeing bad work conditions in countries with less regulations
- MNC's influencing international politics
- Exploitation of labor
- Social welfare schemes
Et cetera, et cetera...
All the problems we hear about with companies leaving their countries and stranding thousands if not millions of people without jobs, and labor issues in other countries all stem from globalization. So we need to decide if the benefits outweigh the costs here or not...
