A fact-finder has:

Social Studies

2 answers:

Gala2k [10]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

A- A high degree of control over the outcome of the dispute.

Explanation:

The judge not only decides the legal issues in the case, but is also the “fact finder” who decides who to believe and who ultimately wins or loses.

Fact-finder or finder of fact, is a person, or group of persons, who determines facts in a legal proceeding, usually a trial. To determine a fact is to decide, from the evidence, whether something existed or some event occurred.

Anna11 [10]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

d. Little control over the either process or the outcome of the negotiation

Explanation:

Fact finder is a situation in which an individual tries to find out the real reason and truth's behind the case. It involves determining relationships in the situation and identifies realities in a particular case. A fact finder has little control over the negotiation and the outcome of the dispute.

You might be interested in

What role do labor unions play in resolving disputes?

Vladimir [108]

The answer is C represent members in negotiations

8 0

2 years ago

Which of the following amendments denies the government authority to house soldiers

Mekhanik [1.2K]

The Third Amendment. :)

4 0

3 years ago

The _____ approach to psychology views the mind as an active and aware problem-solving system. this view contrasts with the ____

vichka [17]

Cognitive/behavior
I'm in the class

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In what way is the north east wind useful

galina1969 [7]

Answer:

Knowing the direction of the wind is an important part of predicting weather because wind brings us our weather. ... The arrow will point to the direction the wind is blowing from so if it is pointing to the east, it means the wind is coming from the east. Additionally, wind direction is where the wind is blowing from.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Marla, a white woman, is married to an african-american man and has a biracial son. she works as a counselor for a large private

Anton [14]

She has a claim based on discrimination by association.
This term refers to the fact that a person is discriminated against based on their association with another person. In this case, Marla was fired because she was associated with a black and a biracial person, not because of her own actions, personality, or skin color. This is illegal as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids it.

4 0

3 years ago