1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nika2105 [10]
3 years ago
12

The weighted moving average forecast for the 5th period, with weights of 0.15 for period 1, 0.20 for period 2, 0.25 for period 3

, and 0.40 for period 4, using the demand data shown below is ___________ period demand 1 3,500 2 3,800 3 3,500 4 4,000
Mathematics
1 answer:
Akimi4 [234]3 years ago
7 0

Multiply the demand values by the weights and report the sum.

0.15×3,500 +0.20×3,800 +0.25×3,500 +0.40×4,000 = 525 +760 +875 +1600

= 3,760

The weighted moving average forecast for the 5th period is 3,760.

You might be interested in
Explain how the difference of a fraction or a rational number and its additive inverse is equal to zero.
Jobisdone [24]
This question is in reverse (in two ways): 

<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>

<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>

<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>

<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>

<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>

<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>

<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>

<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>

<span>--- </span>

<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>

<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>

<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>

<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>

<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>

<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>

<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>

<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Solve the equation.<br><br> 89=x+13(7)
marissa [1.9K]
Answer is x=-2 hope that helps

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The function g(n)=n²-6n+16 represents a parabola.
goblinko [34]

Part A: (n^2-6n)+16

[(n^2-6n+9)-9]+16

(n-3)^2+7

Part B: From the above result,

Vertex (3,7) this is the minimum point of the graph since the coefficient of a is positive

Part C: The axis of symmetry is basically the x coordinate of the vertex, so the axis of symmetry is x=3

Hope this helps!

4 0
3 years ago
ANSWER THESE ILL GIVE U BRAINLIEST
Trava [24]

Answer:

11. a

12. c

13 a

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
16. Peter was told by his teacher that he needed to measure the height of the building in which his
In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

IT'S 20 FEET JUST FOUND OUT

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Given that ABC ~ DEF, if EF = 7.5 what is the length of ?<br><br><br><br> 6.5<br> 6<br> 5<br> 5.5
    10·1 answer
  • How long to go 128 miles
    10·2 answers
  • Hunter installed tiles on a floor with a length of 12 feet and a width of 9 feet in 712 hours. how many square feet of tiles can
    13·1 answer
  • Will Give Someone Brainliest Answer! Taylor had a special coupon, so she and her 3 friends paid a total of $18.20 to bowl. What
    15·2 answers
  • What is the range of this data 3.3, 4.5, 6.7, 1.5, 11.6, 4.5, 11.7, 8.5, 3.2, 6.7,7.9
    9·1 answer
  • I need help plzzzz!!
    14·1 answer
  • What are three rational numbers between -1 and -2
    13·1 answer
  • Which table represents m as a function of t? ​
    15·1 answer
  • Write the function as a sum of partial fractions. Do not determine the numerical values of the coefficients.(a) x/x^2+xâ2(b) 6âx
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP GIVING OUT BRAINLEST
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!