Answer:
If the new reforms bring increase confidence of the investors then the company will have to incur lower borrowing costs as the investor will be available and vice versa.
Explanation:
Suppose that previously our company's credit rating was overrated. Due to recent regulatory reforms, my company achieved a lower credit rating and hence the investor confidence in our company dropped significantly. Now the investor is not interested to invest in my company and to urge them to invest in the company, they will be offered higher interest. If the reforms are going to impact our credit rating adversely then the borrowing cost will increase and vice versa.
Furthermore, Core Principle 3 says that the decsion making of the investor is based on the information that is readily available to him. This means if the reforms increase the access of the borrower through improved credit rating then it will be favourable for the company in terms of lower borrowing costs. If the reforms decrease the access of the borrower through depreciating credit rating then it will adversely affect the company in terms of lower borrowing costs and lower investment access.
The two different methods for evaluating evidence are the
quantitative method and the qualitative method.
The quantitative method is where it is based on measurements
and statistics or analysis of data by gathering with the use of surveys and
questionnaires.
The qualitative method is focused on having to show
explanations or opinions regarding about the study of which will develop ideas
and identify or have insights regarding about the problem.
Answer:
true is the answer I think
Answer:
3 percent
Explanation:
A real interest rate is an interest rate which doesn't have impact of inflation and depicts the real cost of funds to the borrower and the real yield to the lender or an investor.
Inflation = (126-120)/120 = 5%
Real Interest Rate = Nominal Interest Rate - Inflation
= 8% - 5%= 3%
I think it is B please put me brainless answer if I got it right
