Some Native American tribes thought by making a partnership with the settlers that they would be able to trade goods with the settlers and bring peace among the colonists and themselves. A short time of peace was brought among them, before fighting broke out.
Answer:
They were entrepreneurs who launched successful businesses.
Explanation:
Answer:
The situation that have occurred with friendship between Jewell and Amie falls under the in-group–out-group bias, the concept actively researched under the theory of prejudice and group conflict.
Explanation:
In the beginning Jewell became friends with Amie, because she thought that they belong to the same group (<u>in-group</u>). Meanwhile, when she learned Amie was a teacher in her college she realized the belong to a different group (<u>out-group</u>).
This phenomenon is explained in particular due to <em>competition between groups</em>. Here, students and teachers compete, because each of them uses different methods of achieving goals.
For example, students cheat to get good grades, while teachers fight against cheating. By being friends with Amie (<u>the teacher</u>), Jewell (<u>the student</u>) might have become worried that she will disclose some information about how students cheat and thus <u>pose a threat against her own group</u>.
Explanation:
Lex talionis means treating the criminals in the way the criminals treated the victims. In means giving the same sufferings to others as others have caused them suffering.
This principle is not plausible because according to Nathanson, it will make us to act in an immoral way with others. We cannot hijack the hijacker's plane because they did to us. We cannot spy on others because others are spying on us. Nathanson objected the principle because he believes that it is not possible to measure sufferings of others as different people suffered differently. So we cannot bring equal suffering.