Answer:
-0.7 m/sec
Explanation:
Mass of first block = m1 =3.0 kg
Mass of second block = m2= 5.0 kg
Velocity of first block = V1= 1.2 m/s
Velocity of second block = V2 = ?
Momentum of Center of mass MVcom is sum of both blocks momentum and is given by
MVcom= m1v1+m2v2
Where
M= mass of center of mass
Vcom= Velocity of center of mass=0 m/s (because center of mass is at rest , so Vcom = 0 m.sec)
Putting values, we get;
0= 3×1.2+5v2
==> v2= 3.6/5= - 0.7 m/s
-ve sign indicates that block 2 is moving in opposite direction of block 1
Answer:
The Peltier coefficient is a measure of the amount of heat carried by electrons or holes
Explanation:
I think the answer is ruthorford
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
