Both bacteria and amoeba are unicellular organisms. Bacteria are considered to be prokaryotes, whereas amoebas are considered to
be eukaryotes. How will you justify this reasoning? Though both are unicellular, bacteria possess a well-defined nucleus without a nucleolus. Amoebas possesses a nucleus with a nucleolus, but no nuclear membrane. Though both are unicellular, bacteria possess a well-defined nucleus and all essential cell organelles, whereas amoebas do not possess a nucleus or cell organelles, except ribosomes. Though both are unicellular, bacteria doesn’t possess a nucleus or cell organelles, except ribosomes, whereas amoebas possess a well-defined nucleus and all essential cell organelles.
Though both are unicellular, bacteria doesn’t possess a nucleus or cell organelles, except ribosomes, whereas amoebas possess a well-defined nucleus and all essential cell organelles.
Both bacteria and
amoeba are single-celled organisms. They both have ribosomes.
Bacteria is a
prokaryote. It lacks membrane-bound nucleus, mitochondria, chloroplasts or any
membrane-bound organelles.
Amoeba is a eukaryote.
It has a "true" nucleus containing its DNA and organelles which is
responsible for energy production and protein transport.<span>
The cell membrane is semipermeable (or selectively permeable). ... The unique structure of the cell membrane allows small substances (like oxygen or carbon dioxide) to easily pass through.
